Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1117

#351 | Lopen | Posted 8/19/2013 1:08:00 PM | message detail
Votals should get better with school back in session (this is the kinda thing that would be spread via word of mouth) and less fodder in matches.

I could see the later 12 hour matches pulling 45k on regularity. Time will tell.
---
No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
#352 | red sox 777 | Posted 8/19/2013 1:10:43 PM | message detail
Well, there's a nice cut out of nowhere. Breaks the run of 7 consecutive gains.
---
Congratulations to SuperNiceDog, Guru Winner, who was smart enough to pick
your 7 time champion, Link.
#353 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:12:19 PM | message detail
Yeah Aeris has gotta throw out more of those to stay in the game and hope to catch some fire later. Still looking shaky.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#354 | Fayt_Esteed | Posted 8/19/2013 1:12:46 PM | message detail
Wow, 17k already and it's only the second round.
---
"Divine judgment for an evil soul! Sacred Penance! Rest in peace." - Estellise Sidos Heurassein, Tales of Vesperia
#355 | charmander6000 | Posted 8/19/2013 1:15:26 PM | message detail
Yup this match is on pace on cracking the top 10 day vote totals.
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/CB9%20BOP.xls
Points: 65/81 Today's Picks: Link and Aerith
#356 | KanzarisKelshen | Posted 8/19/2013 1:15:40 PM | message detail
Holy gains, Shepard! He took back everything he lost and then some!
#357 | nintendogirl1 (Moderator) | Posted 8/19/2013 1:19:42 PM | message detail
Ya go my variance.

Shepherd keeps this up another couple hours or so it'll be out of reach I think.
---
*shrug*
#358 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:20:05 PM | message detail
Shepard punches out the reporter
---
"But you have been given freedom. Freedom to be...outside."
"I am lightning...the rain transformed."
#359 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:21:34 PM | message detail
Also, I'd be pretty surprised if Shepard isn't stronger now than he was in 2010. Mass Effect didn't even exist on PS3 in 2010, and ME2 was fresh off the presses.

Plus, for all the problems ME3 had, Shepard wasn't one of them. He's just as awesome as he's ever been in ME3, if not moreso. I guess you could argue a bad game could hurt Shep even if he was good in it, but I'd still say he benefited from ME3 regardless of its reception.
---
"Stay with me until the end. Please."
"Not until the end. Always."
#360 | LordoftheMorons | Posted 8/19/2013 1:25:11 PM | message detail
Red is winning that match. Wario isn't going to hold up against actual competition; he isn't particularly likeable.
---
I don't know how much you know about women, but Dr. Pizza is an expert. - The Mana Sword
#361 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:25:48 PM | message detail
Trend chart from the night match:

Time | Link | Raiden | Yoshi | Votes
0:05 | 57.70% | 21.95% | 20.35% | 688
1:00 | 59.35% | 21.77% | 18.88% | 5407
2:00 | 59.72% | 22.66% | 17.62% | 3071
3:00 | 60.19% | 22.83% | 16.98% | 2361
4:00 | 57.95% | 23.56% | 18.49% | 1774
5:00 | 57.22% | 25.00% | 17.78% | 1552
6:00 | 55.60% | 27.95% | 16.45% | 1392
7:00 | 59.53% | 22.98% | 17.50% | 1606
8:00 | 60.48% | 21.52% | 18.00% | 1817
9:00 | 61.81% | 19.84% | 18.35% | 2087
10:00 | 63.15% | 19.57% | 17.28% | 2182
11:00 | 62.04% | 20.20% | 17.76% | 2213
12:00 | 61.76% | 20.79% | 17.44% | 2270

Looks like school is back in session, in more ways than one. After Raiden puts up some strong hours in the night vote, Link simply destroys the last 5 hours of the poll.

X-Stats:

Link – 50.00%
Raiden – 26.90%
Waluigi – 23.71%
Yoshi – 22.93%
Isaac BOI – 17.45%
Tingle – 14.14%
Solaire of Astora – 13.48%
Alan Wake – 9.74%
Demi-Fiend – 9.15%

Link's prediction percentage was 90.47%
---
http://i43.tinypic.com/dgwh0.gif
http://www.majhost.com/gallery/atukam/OHWD/snownd.gif
#362 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:27:48 PM | message detail
LordoftheMorons posted...
Red is winning that match. Wario isn't going to hold up against actual competition; he isn't particularly likeable.


Neither is Wolf, and he still cost Fox the match despite being reduced to looking like bad, bad, bad fodder. Wario's still going to have a marked detrimental effect on Red, and will only underscore just how much Wrex will stand out from the pack.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#363 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:28:10 PM | message detail
Also current X-Stats for this match:

Commander Shepard – 50.00%
Aerith Gainsborough – 49.41%
Captain Olimar – 35.33%
Hero – 33.17%
Tharja – 31.31%
Rinoa Heartilly – 30.96%
Tiny Tina – 30.93%
Juliet Starling – 27.55%
Kain – 23.38%

Should've stuck Rinoa into Tharja's match in place of Juliet, apparently...!
---
"So cold. I am always by your side."
"There ain't no gettin' off of this train we on!"
#364 | CasanovaZelos | Posted 8/19/2013 1:28:52 PM | message detail
Who exactly determines the adjustment value for SFF in the x-stats? Like, I decided to simply estimate Yoshi based off past standings and give him a 32 for my own personal estimates of strength.
---
Green is not a creative color
http://themanicdepressives.wordpress.com/
#365 | Janus5000 | Posted 8/19/2013 1:29:07 PM | message detail
woo Shepard

Magus doubled this guy once so Crono and Pikachu are probably both boned
---
Fight like dragons, have no fear, swords are made of STEEEEEEEEL~
#366 | Then00bAvenger | Posted 8/19/2013 1:29:23 PM | message detail
So even though Yoshi actually got more on Raiden than Waluigi did, he ends up going under him in the x-stats.

X-stats are weird
---
A refusal of praise is a desire to be praised twice.
#367 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:29:58 PM | message detail
CasanovaZelos posted...
Who exactly determines the adjustment value for SFF in the x-stats? Like, I decided to simply estimate Yoshi based off past standings and give him a 32 for my own personal estimates of strength.


I usually base it off of past X-Stats placements, but Yoshi hasn't had a clear reading since...

...2003, holy crap.
---
http://i52.tinypic.com/2zfiu09.gif
http://i54.tinypic.com/10729w2.gif
#368 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:30:46 PM | message detail
Then00bAvenger posted...
So even though Yoshi actually got more on Raiden than Waluigi did, he ends up going under him in the x-stats.

X-stats are weird


Well, it's the format.

The X-Stats are calculated based on what 2nd and 3rd place get on 1st place. But if you extrapolate 2nd place vs. 3rd place, the number comes out differently.
---
"Hold on a minute! That testimony stinks!"
"Witness! You can't just say 'Hello' and expect us to get anywhere! I want you to testify!"
#369 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:31:23 PM | message detail
CasanovaZelos posted...
Who exactly determines the adjustment value for SFF in the x-stats? Like, I decided to simply estimate Yoshi based off past standings and give him a 32 for my own personal estimates of strength.


It depends on whose stats you're using. Yoshi is particularly hard to gauge, in large part because there's a very vocal crowd, myself among them, who think he's a minor fraud. Haven't had a read on him since he got obliterated by Squall.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#370 | CasanovaZelos | Posted 8/19/2013 1:31:39 PM | message detail
Yeah, Yoshi's stats make no sense at all. I figured 32 will be good enough, as that puts Solaire slightly above Isaac, which I think makes sense. With my adjustment, I got:
Link: 50%
xYoshi: 32%
Raiden: 26.90%
Waluigi: 23.71%
xSolaire: 18.81%
Isaac (BoI): 17.45%
Tingle: 14.14%
xDemi-Fiend: 12.77%
Alan Wake: 9.74%
---
Green is not a creative color
http://themanicdepressives.wordpress.com/
#371 | The Mana Sword | Posted 8/19/2013 1:32:22 PM | message detail
LeonhartFour posted...
CasanovaZelos posted...
Who exactly determines the adjustment value for SFF in the x-stats? Like, I decided to simply estimate Yoshi based off past standings and give him a 32 for my own personal estimates of strength.


I usually base it off of past X-Stats placements, but Yoshi hasn't had a clear reading since...

...2003, holy crap.


I dunno, his first two 2006 matches and his first two 2007 matches seem reasonable enough.
---
i'll do rydia -Dante
#372 | squexa | Posted 8/19/2013 1:33:28 PM | message detail
LeonhartFour posted...

Waluigi – 23.71%
Yoshi – 22.93%


LOL
#373 | Janus5000 | Posted 8/19/2013 1:33:50 PM | message detail
2003? He lost to another Mario character. Who knows if that's even legit?
---
Fight like dragons, have no fear, swords are made of STEEEEEEEEL~
#374 | The Mana Sword | Posted 8/19/2013 1:34:13 PM | message detail
And yeah, his 2008 first round seems fine too.
---
i'll do rydia -Dante
#375 | TheOneAboveAll | Posted 8/19/2013 1:35:01 PM | message detail
Then00bAvenger posted...
So even though Yoshi actually got more on Raiden than Waluigi did, he ends up going under him in the x-stats.

X-stats are weird


It's only because we do all of the x-stats relative to the match winner. And that's totally arbitrary. We could just as easily use Yoshi's x-stat on Raiden instead of Link for his value.

Hey Leon, why do you calculate based on the winner? I mean, it might be easier, but it's kinda arbitrary, isn't it?
#376 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:35:33 PM | message detail
I don't like 32 on Link. I don't see Yoshi improving much if at all from 42 on Squall, and that would put Squall at 38 on Link, which puts Snake at close to 47 on Link.

...32 will work just fine, actually.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#377 | KanzarisKelshen | Posted 8/19/2013 1:35:54 PM | message detail
Oh man, 200 vote barrier GET! Shepard on a tear now!
#378 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:36:31 PM | message detail
The Mana Sword posted...
I dunno, his first two 2006 matches and his first two 2007 matches seem reasonable enough.


Yeah, but I'd have to make an adjustment based off of a proportion to Dante or Knuckles that probably doesn't exist anymore. Basing him off of his first match against Squall in 2008 would probably be the most accurate at this point, and that's probably not that great either.

Janus5000 posted...
2003? He lost to another Mario character. Who knows if that's even legit?


It's closer to legit than his other performances. How much SFF are you expecting in a 56/44 match anyway?
---
http://i.imgur.com/kCpvD.gif
#379 | KanzarisKelshen | Posted 8/19/2013 1:37:04 PM | message detail
Karma Hunter posted...
I don't like 32 on Link. I don't see Yoshi improving much if at all from 42 on Squall, and that would put Squall at 38 on Link, which puts Snake at close to 47 on Link.

...32 will work just fine, actually.


Squall probably is at that level, so I can believe it. Snake seems a bit too high but we don't have a super clean read on him. 45 though? I can buy it.

(Unless we want to argue Mario is 48% on BL before SFF...I can totally see that, actually.)
#380 | 1337gamerpr0 | Posted 8/19/2013 1:37:32 PM | message detail
Karma Hunter posted...
I don't like 32 on Link. I don't see Yoshi improving much if at all from 42 on Squall, and that would put Squall at 38 on Link, which puts Snake at close to 47 on Link.

...32 will work just fine, actually.


:lol
#381 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:37:39 PM | message detail
TheOneAboveAll posted...
Hey Leon, why do you calculate based on the winner? I mean, it might be easier, but it's kinda arbitrary, isn't it?


Because ultimately the X-Stats are about how characters would do on the winner.

But basically the moral of the story is to take multi-way X-Stats with several helpings of salt.
---
http://i.imgur.com/fe05x.png
http://i.imgur.com/stNJf.png
#382 | kinsho3 | Posted 8/19/2013 1:42:01 PM | message detail
She just refuses to die. If Shep can get this to 300, the match is over.
---
Drop it to the floor...
#383 | pjbasis | Posted 8/19/2013 1:43:47 PM | message detail
Goo Shepard put her under 40%!

Also first ninepack Chester stats! lol sff

Link - 13.51’
Raiden - 4.97’
Yoshi - 4.01’
Waluigi - 3.91’
Isaac - 2.53’
Tingle - 2.22’
Solaire - 1.67’
Alan - 1.10’
Demi-Fiend - 1.00’
---
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/B8%20Girls%202012/pjbas.png
SuperNiceDog - 1, pjbasis - 0
#384 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:46:31 PM | message detail
Shepard and Aerith have basically flip-flopped the last three updates.
---
http://i52.tinypic.com/2zfiu09.gif
http://i54.tinypic.com/10729w2.gif
#385 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:46:58 PM | message detail
KanzarisKelshen posted...
Karma Hunter posted...
I don't like 32 on Link. I don't see Yoshi improving much if at all from 42 on Squall, and that would put Squall at 38 on Link, which puts Snake at close to 47 on Link.

...32 will work just fine, actually.


Squall probably is at that level, so I can believe it. Snake seems a bit too high but we don't have a super clean read on him. 45 though? I can buy it.

(Unless we want to argue Mario is 48% on BL before SFF...I can totally see that, actually.)


This isn't BL, this is estimates against current Link... and Link being able to bring someone from being worth 48 on him down to 38~ post-SFF would be by far the most extreme SFF we've ever seen. If anything it would be more evidence on the pile of Samus/Snake being stronger than Mario indirectly.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#386 | pjbasis | Posted 8/19/2013 1:49:59 PM | message detail
So Yoshi is weaker than Waluigi with x-stats and not chester stats huh
---
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/B8%20Girls%202012/pjbas.png
SuperNiceDog - 1, pjbasis - 0
#387 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:51:07 PM | message detail
x-stats > chester stats confirmed
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#388 | nintendogirl1 (Moderator) | Posted 8/19/2013 1:52:15 PM | message detail
Karma Hunter posted...
x-stats > chester stats confirmed


I don't think you understand how the greater than sign works.
---
*shrug*
#389 | LeonhartFour | Posted 8/19/2013 1:56:11 PM | message detail
nintendogirl1 posted...
I don't think you understand how the greater than sign works.


Yoshi ending up above Waluigi is a major blow to the Chester Stats.

Although I assume pjbasis is doing the silly thing of comparing Raiden and Yoshi to each other than to Link and that's why Yoshi ends up ahead of Waluigi.
---
http://img571.imageshack.us/img571/9919/leonhart.png
#390 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 1:57:54 PM | message detail
too bad

WALUIGI TIME

http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Waluigi_8758af_655568.jpg
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#391 | AxemRedRanger (Topic Creator) | Posted 8/19/2013 2:05:45 PM | message detail
Using Yoshi/Squall I in 2008 and Squall's 2010 value, Yoshi is worth 30.6% on Link.

2010 Dante was worth 31.39% on Link. He might have benefited slightly from Ryu getting anti-votes against Cloud. Yoshi still being around the same ballpark as Dante sounds viable to me.
---
[NO BARKLEY NO PEACE]
#392 | Nanis23 | Posted 8/19/2013 2:09:20 PM | message detail
7 hours till Draven proves he is a fraud
Maybe then people will finally realize there is such a big difference between a fodder and a mega fodder to 2 near elite/high midcarder

Not to talk about beating Link...the difference in power in those contests is something else
Link crashed Luigi so bad,and Luigi owned Zero like nothing
This is just one example of how much power difference can be vast,and this match will prove it perfectly
#393 | KanzarisKelshen | Posted 8/19/2013 2:09:45 PM | message detail
Karma Hunter posted...
KanzarisKelshen posted...
Karma Hunter posted...
I don't like 32 on Link. I don't see Yoshi improving much if at all from 42 on Squall, and that would put Squall at 38 on Link, which puts Snake at close to 47 on Link.

...32 will work just fine, actually.


Squall probably is at that level, so I can believe it. Snake seems a bit too high but we don't have a super clean read on him. 45 though? I can buy it.

(Unless we want to argue Mario is 48% on BL before SFF...I can totally see that, actually.)


This isn't BL, this is estimates against current Link... and Link being able to bring someone from being worth 48 on him down to 38~ post-SFF would be by far the most extreme SFF we've ever seen. If anything it would be more evidence on the pile of Samus/Snake being stronger than Mario indirectly.


I can buy that. In practice it means Mario is very likely the Number 2 guy because if you take Link out he ends up meeting everyone who can beat him directly, so the numbers bear out that he has the intangibles needed to win when not faced with the guy at the top of the Ninty totem pole.
#394 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 2:11:11 PM | message detail
KanzarisKelshen posted...
Karma Hunter posted...
KanzarisKelshen posted...
Karma Hunter posted...
I don't like 32 on Link. I don't see Yoshi improving much if at all from 42 on Squall, and that would put Squall at 38 on Link, which puts Snake at close to 47 on Link.

...32 will work just fine, actually.


Squall probably is at that level, so I can believe it. Snake seems a bit too high but we don't have a super clean read on him. 45 though? I can buy it.

(Unless we want to argue Mario is 48% on BL before SFF...I can totally see that, actually.)


This isn't BL, this is estimates against current Link... and Link being able to bring someone from being worth 48 on him down to 38~ post-SFF would be by far the most extreme SFF we've ever seen. If anything it would be more evidence on the pile of Samus/Snake being stronger than Mario indirectly.


I can buy that. In practice it means Mario is very likely the Number 2 guy because if you take Link out he ends up meeting everyone who can beat him directly, so the numbers bear out that he has the intangibles needed to win when not faced with the guy at the top of the Ninty totem pole.


It actually wouldn't mean that at all in practice, actually. Snake/Cloud and Samus/Cloud are not gimmes, and if Cloud can beat either one of them while Mario is weaker indirectly it means Mario can't beat Cloud.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#395 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 2:14:43 PM | message detail
It's also very difficult for me to envision Cloud being our #5 character at best now. Maybe not #2, but suddenly being #5 would be a heckuva fall. Heck you may as well start arguing post-SSB4 Mega Man over him at that point if you think the decline's been that precipitous.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#396 | KamikazePotato | Posted 8/19/2013 2:15:17 PM | message detail
Yeah, this is very much over.
---
Black Turtle did a pretty good job.
#397 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 2:15:46 PM | message detail
Nanis23 posted...
7 hours till Draven proves he is a fraud
Maybe then people will finally realize there is such a big difference between a fodder and a mega fodder to 2 near elite/high midcarder

Not to talk about beating Link...the difference in power in those contests is something else
Link crashed Luigi so bad,and Luigi owned Zero like nothing
This is just one example of how much power difference can be vast,and this match will prove it perfectly


This is borderline incoherent.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)
#398 | Nanis23 | Posted 8/19/2013 2:17:46 PM | message detail
Karma Hunter posted...
Nanis23 posted...
7 hours till Draven proves he is a fraud
Maybe then people will finally realize there is such a big difference between a fodder and a mega fodder to 2 near elite/high midcarder

Not to talk about beating Link...the difference in power in those contests is something else
Link crashed Luigi so bad,and Luigi owned Zero like nothing
This is just one example of how much power difference can be vast,and this match will prove it perfectly


This is borderline incoherent.


Yeah I worded it badly
My english sucks
#399 | charmander6000 | Posted 8/19/2013 2:21:49 PM | message detail
It's also very difficult for me to envision Cloud being our #5 character at best now. Maybe not #2, but suddenly being #5 would be a heckuva fall. Heck you may as well start arguing post-SSB4 Mega Man over him at that point if you think the decline's been that precipitous.

It's not much of a fall to go from 2 to 5, Snake and Samus are essentially equal in 2010 and Mario is probably not much stronger, if he even is.
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/CB9%20BOP.xls
Points: 65/81 Today's Picks: Link and Aerith
#400 | Karma Hunter | Posted 8/19/2013 2:24:25 PM | message detail
I think I understand what you're driving at after a second look, but it's not entirely apt. L-Block was weak enough to easily lose to Kirby but because of its loyal bloc of voters and getting a lot of steam/rallies, it was eventually able to win the contest over Link. So if Draven can get another rally and retain his the loyalty of his voters (and his first match was legit... which is debatable), then he has something of a shot.

Comparing Link/Luigi and Luigi/Zero is pretty unfair too. Link SFFed the bajeezus out of Luigi, and that makes him look much worse than he actually is. Putting it another way, back in 2005 Solid Snake went 50/50 with Bowser. He won and in the very next match put up 43% on Mario. Yet Bowser gets killed 71/29 in a direct match with Mario, as we saw just the year before.

Speaking of that performance I'd really like to see Snake/Mario again - I don't place much stock into the people that say Snake has no chance because the last time we saw them 1v1 he got 43% pre-Brawl announcement, pre-Brawl release, pre-MGS4, and pre-MGSV hype/trailers/etc. Snake should at the very least make that a heckuva match.
---
http://i.imgur.com/xiKRQ2F.gif
Proud to share the same sig as Chen Kenichi's #1 Fan (also Yoblazer)