Click Here

GameFAQs Contests

Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1029

First | Previous | Page 3 of 10 | Next | Last
#101 | Safer Sephiroth 777 | Posted 12/5/2011 10:55:09 AM | message detail
Still can't believe that Mario/Sonic is 70-30.Okay I know Sonic is probably the weakest N9 member but still...
---
GameFaqs is NOT the place to go for relationship advice.Nobody here gets any action unless it is their right or left hand.Including me.~Dawn and Dusk~
Click Here
#102 | XIII_rocks | Posted 12/5/2011 10:58:29 AM | message detail
Sonic > Crono
---
c
#103 | pjbasis | Posted 12/5/2011 11:00:52 AM | message detail
Final Fantasy VIII would beat any KH or MGS except maybe 1.
---
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/pjbasis.png
#104 | GranzonEx | Posted 12/5/2011 11:02:34 AM | message detail
How strong is MGS1 exactly?
---
Black: 3310-7431-2094
#105 | charmander6000 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:05:37 AM | message detail
I think some people consider it to be a top 10 game, though if anyone remembers the second games contest we had like 20 "top 10 games"

I think people find FFX vs MGS to be debatable.
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/Rivalry%20BOP.xls
Rivalry Rumble: 57/64 Today: Mario/Bowser
#106 | foxhead84 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:09:49 AM | message detail
The Real Truth posted...
What's Moltar's email?

E-mail - mastermoltar@gmail.com
It's on the first post of every "Rivalry Rumble Contest Analysis Crew" topic
---
Link's is pretty much the video game equivalent of the Jesus story. -- Yoblaser
#107 | red sox 777 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:12:22 AM | message detail
FFX and MGS is debatable, yeah. Both are probably borderline top 10, or a bit below that.
---
2002 Link, 2003 Cloud, 2004 Link, 2005 Link, 2006 Link, 2008 Link, 2010 Link, 2011 Cloud.
Link 6, Cloud 2
#108 | nintendogirl1 (Moderator) | Posted 12/5/2011 11:17:46 AM | message detail
OoT
FF7
LttP
RBY
Mario64
Mario3
CT
MGS
MGS4
FFX
SMW
SSBB
SSBM
RE4
TP
MM

Obviously in no specific order would be my assumed top 16. Anyone feel like ordering them?
---
Be my guest.
#109 | Kotetsu534 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:19:33 AM | message detail
The amount of room for debate (beyond OoT > FFVII > all) in that list is what makes me want a 1v1, no divisions by era, 128 entrant games contest.
---
Praise the Black Turtle, Game of the Decade Guru Champ.
(Well, I never promised creativity, did I?!)
#110 | GrapefruitKing | Posted 12/5/2011 11:20:57 AM | message detail

From: Kotetsu534 | #109
The amount of room for debate (beyond OoT > FFVII > all) in that list is what makes me want a 1v1, no divisions by era, 128 entrant games contest.


That would be amazing, but it won't happen. Because we get crappy contests instead
---
http://i42.tinypic.com/11jol1t.gif
Oracle Challenge ~ Rank: 15th ~Today's prediction: Mario/Bowser - 65.78%
#111 | Lopen | Posted 12/5/2011 11:21:54 AM | message detail

From: transcience | #098
bringing it up again because it got no traction 2 minutes before match time and because this match is garbage -

I think Squall has a huge anchor in Seifer, not because of his assumed lack of strength but because it ties him to FF8 alone. it's not really a fair comparison since it's ten years old and only one match, but Squall got doubled by pre-Brawl Snake. if this match is about FF8 vs. the KH series and we're comparing rivalries, I'm not sure Squall comes out looking too good there.

obviously this is a super reductionist view and is designed to show Squall in a bad light but it's worth bringing up. his performances in round 1 and 2 have not been all that stellar either (though not objectively bad, not that they've had any real matches)


If it makes you feel better, and it obviously probably makes you feel worse, I agree with this completely.

That being said I feel a lot less confident in Sora > Squall than I would if Dante squeaked out the win yesterday cause Squall could (r)SFF Sora rendering it moot. I do think Sora's rivalry is the stronger one in this format though.
---
No problem!
This is a cute and pop genocide of love!
#112 | Karma Hunter | Posted 12/5/2011 11:38:39 AM | message detail
pjbasis posted...
Final Fantasy VIII would beat any KH or MGS except maybe 1.

MGS1 already beat FFVIII to a pulp.
---
http://i48.tinypic.com/1ryijd.jpg
http://fc03.deviantart.com/fs14/f/2007/020/b/f/Ariel_by_lolita_art.jpg
#113 | AxemRedRanger | Posted 12/5/2011 11:38:40 AM | message detail
I think we have a fairly non-controversial top 8, if not on the order then at least in what games it consists of:
OoT, FFVII, RBY, LttP, SM64, CT, SMW, and SMB3.
Maybe you could argue something outside of that beats Chrono Trigger, I guess? Eh.

Nothing in Game of the Decade really seemed above the pack so I don't really want to put any of them in a top 10. Brawl/FFX/Majora/Melee were all rather close together.
Maybe FFX post-HD remake can manage something, though.

Other strong games...uh. Goldeneye, Metal Gear Solid, Final Fantasy VIII, and Super Mario Bros.? Might be reaching a little on that last one but I'd give it a shot against these others.
---
[NO BARKLEY NO PEACE]
#114 | BK_Sheikah00 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:52:14 AM | message detail | (edited)
I'd take FFVI over VIII and X, easily.

Or at least, I think the FF and Zeldas that are close to each other would be: FFVII/OoT, FFVI/ALttP, FFX/MM, FFVIII/TP.
---
*huggles*
#115 | Kotetsu534 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:48:53 AM | message detail
By the earliest point at which we could have a games contest, three years will have passed since Games '09, which is enough time for strengths to change. And since that was a fourway contest with SFF/LFF all over the place, you can argue anything you want on the back of it. That's not to mention how the GOTD crew would stack up against the old guard - certainly, the stats crew would expect them to get roundly hosed, but that's not guaranteed - or the wildcard factor of the "newest" games - y'know, ME2, ME3, Skyrim, Skyward Sword, SMG2 etc. After GSC failed to show up against MM, there's certainly some doubt as to how RBY would handle the switch up to 1v1. Would it be the solid #3 it appeared in '09?
---
Praise the Black Turtle, Game of the Decade Guru Champ.
(Well, I never promised creativity, did I?!)
#116 | charmander6000 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:49:20 AM | message detail
FFVI didn't exactly look impressive in the last contest, it might take VIII, but not X.
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/Rivalry%20BOP.xls
Rivalry Rumble: 57/64 Today: Mario/Bowser
#117 | Kotetsu534 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:49:40 AM | message detail
I'd take FFVI over VIII and X, easily.

*resists urge to explain why he'd take X > VIII and VI, easily*
---
Praise the Black Turtle, Game of the Decade Guru Champ.
(Well, I never promised creativity, did I?!)
#118 | wg64Z | Posted 12/5/2011 11:50:16 AM | message detail
I think SSBM > SM64 to be honest.
#119 | charmander6000 | Posted 12/5/2011 11:54:48 AM | message detail
SM64 almost took out LttP, I don't see Melee doing that
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/Rivalry%20BOP.xls
Rivalry Rumble: 57/64 Today: Mario/Bowser
#120 | GranzonEx | Posted 12/5/2011 11:59:01 AM | message detail
I would honestly take 4 over 6 at this point. And neither are top 20 games imo.
---
Black: 3310-7431-2094
#121 | TRE Public Account | Posted 12/5/2011 12:03:28 PM | message detail
Kefka and Terra have looked better as of late. This is attributed to Dissidia, but it is also possible that part of it was due to FF3 getting a bit stronger again. It could even be due to Dissidia getting people to go back and play FF3.
---
Pokemon VGC2011 US Nationals - 54th place
Pokemon VGC2012 NW Regional - 16th place
#122 | foxhead84 | Posted 12/5/2011 12:05:26 PM | message detail
GranzonEx posted...
I would honestly take 4 over 6 at this point. And neither are top 20 games imo.

After what Terra and Kefka did, I would take 6 over 4... but yeah neither are top 20 games.
---
Link's is pretty much the video game equivalent of the Jesus story. -- Yoblaser
#123 | Wii_TuRtLe | Posted 12/5/2011 12:36:03 PM | message detail
foxhead84 posted...
GranzonEx posted...
I would honestly take 4 over 6 at this point. And neither are top 20 games imo.

After what Terra and Kefka did, I would take 6 over 4... but yeah neither are top 20 games.


Nothing 4 has ever done makes me think it would get within 10% of FF6 straight up. And 6 is top 15, if not top 10 still.
---
Game of the Decade? More like Guru of the Decade mirite?
#124 | pjbasis | Posted 12/5/2011 12:43:33 PM | message detail

From: Karma Hunter | #112
MGS1 already beat FFVIII to a pulp.


LOL 4 ways, etc, though I did say "sans 1" anyway.

From: Kotetsu534 | #117
*resists urge to explain why he'd take X > VIII and VI, easily*


*resists urge to explain why he'd take VIII > VI easily and VIII > X with moderate deliberation*
---
http://i498.photobucket.com/albums/rr345/Rakaputra/pjbasis.png
#125 | Xuxon | Posted 12/5/2011 12:48:29 PM | message detail
X > VIII, there shouldn't be any doubt about that. VI is kind of a wild card, though.
#126 | nintendogirl1 (Moderator) | Posted 12/5/2011 12:48:55 PM | message detail
Why are you people resisting these urges? This topic exists so you can give in to them.
---
Sillies.
#127 | pjbasis | Posted 12/5/2011 12:52:13 PM | message detail
#128 | PartOfYourWorld | Posted 12/5/2011 1:02:42 PM | message detail
FF6 vs FF8 is a tough one. Back before the 2009 contest, I presumed VIII would be stronger and thought I called that correctly after the contest. Now, I'm not so sure. With all the anti-voting new FF gets, VI can split the actual FF fanbase and get enough old school Nintendo support to win. Wouldn't surprise me.
---
Yoblazer: http://i33.tinypic.com/ml36gl_th.gif
Watch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world!
#129 | vcharon | Posted 12/5/2011 1:26:41 PM | message detail
Sonic is going to look extremely bad if Mario manages to come into contact with Link again this contest.
---
:>
#130 | foxhead84 | Posted 12/5/2011 1:37:56 PM | message detail
speaking about FF VI... I know 7,8 and 9 have been release on the PSN.

Will 6 be release? Any chance of that happening? It would give the boost Kefka need in order to finally win something relevant.
---
Link's is pretty much the video game equivalent of the Jesus story. -- Yoblaser
#131 | SuperNiceDog | Posted 12/5/2011 1:42:56 PM | message detail
My ordering of Ngirl's Top 16 games

1. OoT
2. FF7
3. RBY(mainly a result of the site getting younger(18-24 main ages of people on this site), more nostalgia for this over LttP)
4. Lttp
5. Super Smash Bros.!!!!(never been tested in a contest setting. I honestly think the game would be one of the biggest suprise beasts. "Super Smash Bros. would have been a 12 seed in the Best Game Ever II Contest in 2009, but it replaced by Suikoden after Board 8 recommended the swap in an Add-Remove topic." What a joke. When people wax nostaglically about the N64, what game most often comes to their mind? Is is OOT? No its most likely the hours they spent playing the original Super Smash Bros. with their friends! The game comes from the most nostalgic periods for board 8ers, being released in 1999, the peak of the N64's strongest period.
6. Mario 64(imo weaker than the original smash.)
7. CT
8. LoZ: MM
9. Super Mario World
10. Mario 3
11. LoZ: TP
12: SSBM
13. Final Fantasy X
14. SSBB
15. RE4
16. Legend of Zelda: Skyward Sword(too early for the game to have made an impact yet, but still its been critically reviewed well, and its a Zelda game)

MGS and MGS4 would be like top 25(low 20s most likely)
---
MMM... cookies
#132 | AxemRedRanger | Posted 12/5/2011 1:48:09 PM | message detail | (edited)
speaking about FF VI... I know 7,8 and 9 have been release on the PSN.

Will 6 be release? Any chance of that happening? It would give the boost Kefka need in order to finally win something relevant.


Yes, it's getting released on PSN.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Fantasy_VI#PlayStation_Network

Final Fantasy VI was released as a PSOne Classic in Japan on April 20, 2011, and in PAL territories on June 2, 2011.[60] It will be released in North America on December 6, 2011.[4]

...Tomorrow, if wikipedia is to be believed. That's kind of spooky.

It also got released on Wii Virtual Console earlier this year.

Original Super Smash Bros.? It could be pretty strong, but #5? Not buying that in a million years and would be very shocked if it beat Melee.
---
[NO BARKLEY NO PEACE]
#133 | LeonhartFour | Posted 12/5/2011 2:02:44 PM | message detail | (edited)

From: PartOfYourWorld | #058
I'm trying to act like there is nothing more than a very minute possibility that Samus could have gone even with Mario in any other year, because there isn't.


And I'm saying that's very presumptive based solely on Mario/Samus 2005 and it's a bit shortsighted, acting like nothing ever changes within the same fanbase ever.

but the size of the boosts wasn't so huge as to suddenly make a 60/40 out of a 50/50.


Are you trying to say there was no SFF in Mario/Samus or something? Because the Mario Boost would've essentially made a 50/50-ish match out of a 55/45 match, and Mario got SFF on top of that. That's not an unrealistic boost by any means.

Recall Yoshi's final match against Mega Man that year. Luigi also still lost easily to Tifa, who then lost easily to Sonic. Heck, Mario's win over Snake was identical to what Mega Man did against Snake in 2004. Same percentage and everything.


40% on 2005 Sonic (which Luigi got the very next year on Sonic, for the record) is better than 40% on 2003 Squall, as is the 47% he got on Tifa. 2005 Snake is also stronger than 2004 Snake by a decent margin as well. Mega Man would not have gone 57/43 on Snake in 2005. Mega Man/Yoshi can be attributed to SFF (and a ridiculously imbalanced pic in Mega Man's factor) if we can attribute Mega Man getting whipped by Link and Mario to SFF. Not sure why Mega Man is only the victim of it and not the beneficiary of it when it comes to Nintendo.

From: PartOfYourWorld | #059
I think you're forgetting the large majority of matches where luck isn't involved. What if the same guy who took Majora to win also tried to "get lucky" by taking Morrowind over Melee? Well, there goes his bracket.


I feel like you're looking at this idea of "luck" differently than I am. I've already said in the past that most matches require no luck and only logic based on previous results. I'd wager most of us predict at least 4/5 of contest matches correctly, but what's the difference in that 1 we do get wrong?

Like I said, if you're wagering on Rivalry Factor mattering in this contest, you're hoping to get a little lucky because what if rivalries don't matter? Sure, you made a calculated risk, but you could still be wrong because we have zero data to go on to say it matters. If you predict a huge boost based on some factor like a new game, you're still needing to get a little lucky because there's no way to measure how much a new release will boost a character. It's a calculated risk because it's logical to assume a big new game boosts a character, but you're still betting a lot on how much because there's no way of knowing.

And that's luck.
---
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7760/222bj.jpg
#134 | UltimaterializerX | Posted 12/5/2011 2:03:38 PM | message detail
128 games with no gimmicks would be the best contest, but Allen is addicted to dumb gimmicks every year. Some of them work by sheer luck (Game of the Decade, the 12 hour voting format), some don't.

This one is definitely "didn't work" territory. We're seriously going to have a full battle leaderboard of perfect brackets.
---
You've got me wondering why I like it rough.
Is it because you don't mean it, or because I don't feel it?
#135 | GrapefruitKing | Posted 12/5/2011 2:04:11 PM | message detail
predict this fourpack:

Sonic vs. Robotnik
Squall vs. Seifer

Ryu vs. Ken
Mega Man vs. Dr. Wily
---
http://i42.tinypic.com/11jol1t.gif
Oracle Challenge ~ Rank: 15th ~Today's prediction: Mario/Bowser - 65.78%
#136 | LOLContests | Posted 12/5/2011 2:04:14 PM | message detail
G/S/C > Majora's Mask wasn't fanboyism. It was based on a direct match. How can anyone say otherwise with a straight face? I took G/S/C and MM is my favorite game of all time. Taking G/S/C to the semifinals was definitely not a fanboy pick.

Saying "Well, the 2009 match was weird" isn't logic unless you can give a reason why that makes sense (Note: Saying that MGS SFFd MM more than a Pokemon game SFFd another one does not make sense.)

Most contests are decided based on logic, not luck. Getting lucky with an upset in a late round* doesn't matter if logic hadn't allowed you to call matches like Ninjas > Leon/Ada earlier in the contest. Very few matches are not foreseeable based on previous results, and the chances of those matches happening late in the contest is even lower. 2003, 2007, and Fall 2010 are rare exceptions.


*Correctly predicting a rally isn't even luck, IMO. Link > Snake was luck if the person thought that Snake was straight up more popular than Cloud or if they thought Vincent would be there dragging him down, but if they predicted it because they thought Snake would boost from the round before, then that's not luck, because they correctly predicted what would actually happen.
---
"What's wrong with bootblacking? We like it very much!"
This is Yesmar.
#137 | LeonhartFour | Posted 12/5/2011 2:05:03 PM | message detail

From: Karma Hunter | #112
MGS1 already beat FFVIII to a pulp.


An Ulti-style beating anyway, since it was like 54/46 based on that match. A solid victory (no pun intended ho ho ho) for sure, but it wasn't that lopsided.

It kind of surprises me that people seem to think more of FFVIII's strength than I do though! I would never take VIII over VI or X.
---
http://i52.tinypic.com/2zfiu09.gif
http://i54.tinypic.com/10729w2.gif
#138 | LeonhartFour | Posted 12/5/2011 2:07:23 PM | message detail

From: LOLContests | #136
*Correctly predicting a rally isn't even luck, IMO. Link > Snake was luck if the person thought that Snake was straight up more popular than Cloud or if they thought Vincent would be there dragging him down, but if they predicted it because they thought Snake would boost from the round before, then that's not luck, because they correctly predicted what would actually happen.


That's still a bit of luck, in my opinion, because you're still betting on something happening that you have no realistic way of predicting will happen. You still have to get a bit lucky to call a mid-contest boost, regardless of the cause.
---
http://i43.tinypic.com/dgwh0.gif
http://www.majhost.com/gallery/atukam/OHWD/snownd.gif
#139 | Xuxon | Posted 12/5/2011 2:09:28 PM | message detail

From: LOLContests | #136
*Correctly predicting a rally isn't even luck, IMO. Link > Snake was luck if the person thought that Snake was straight up more popular than Cloud or if they thought Vincent would be there dragging him down, but if they predicted it because they thought Snake would boost from the round before, then that's not luck, because they correctly predicted what would actually happen.


Wait, what? Crono was dragging down Cloud exactly like Vincent would have. Probably more because Vincent would have gotten even less votes.
#140 | charmander6000 | Posted 12/5/2011 2:09:55 PM | message detail
logic gets you a decent bracket, luck gets you a winning bracket.
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/Rivalry%20BOP.xls
Rivalry Rumble: 57/64 Today: Mario/Bowser
#141 | LeonhartFour | Posted 12/5/2011 2:10:30 PM | message detail
Then Crono would've dragged Cloud down worse than Vincent because Vincent would be leeching fewer overall votes.

I don't think Crono LFF'd Cloud though. There hasn't been much evidence that FFVII and CT have disproportionate overlap, and it's not like there haven't been opportunities.
---
http://www.gifsoup.com/view/593815/frasier-and-niles-dance-o.gif
#142 | Xuxon | Posted 12/5/2011 2:12:52 PM | message detail
Cloud vs Link was disproportionate, though, not just Snake compared to everyone else. I don't see how there wasn't LFF.
#143 | PartOfYourWorld | Posted 12/5/2011 2:13:06 PM | message detail
Leon, the SFF is directly tied to Mario and Samus; it would have been a huge part of any Mario/Samus match in any given year. It's part of the reason WHY the boost wouldn't have changed the result in the first place and why the Mario supporters decided to side with him. I'm not even sure what we're going on about here.

I'm saying that the idea that luck may have "saved" the Mario supporters is unrealistic, and it serves to lessen the credit earned by people who made a smart risk. Mario would have taken that match in any year.
---
Yoblazer: http://i32.tinypic.com/zlf1w7.gif
Watch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world!
#144 | LOLContests | Posted 12/5/2011 2:14:07 PM | message detail
logic gets you a decent bracket, luck gets you a winning bracket.

But those winning brackets come out of a pool of decent brackets, which you can't have without logic. Luck might sometimes determine who gets 1st and 2nd, but to even get to that level you need logic.
---
"What's wrong with bootblacking? We like it very much!"
This is Yesmar.
#145 | charmander6000 | Posted 12/5/2011 2:14:29 PM | message detail
As for Mario/Samus there's no doubt that Samus was stronger in 2004, you can call rSFF, but we have yet to see another example and even if it does exist there's still no doubt that Samus was stronger indirectly.

In 2005 based on Ganondorf and Zero I think we can all agree that Mario was at least just as strong as Samus
---
BOP Results: http://www.freewebs.com/charmander6000/Rivalry%20BOP.xls
Rivalry Rumble: 57/64 Today: Mario/Bowser
#146 | LeonhartFour | Posted 12/5/2011 2:15:04 PM | message detail
But I think it's a bit presumptuous to act like the SFF falls the same way every year no matter what.

I don't recall Aerith doubling Sora in 2007.
---
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/7760/222bj.jpg
#147 | Xuxon | Posted 12/5/2011 2:15:20 PM | message detail
All Leon's saying as that Mario might not have beaten Samus in 2004. He didn't even say it was a high probability that Samus would win, just that Mario pickers might have possibly been saved by luck. I don't think that's an unfair statement, though I don't think it serves as a very good example.
#148 | UltimaterializerX | Posted 12/5/2011 2:16:45 PM | message detail

From: LOLContests | #136
Most contests are decided based on logic, not luck.


As someone who isn't a slave to LOL x-stats and actually won one of these, I can comfortably say this mentality is laughable. If your goal is getting in the 99th percentile without ever winning, then yeah contests come down to logic. If you want to win, you need to pick a good upset and run with it. The entire stats topic laughed when I said Melee would win D128, and I laughed at them in return all the way through playing my free games.

The only contests you can actually win that way are the worst of the worst of the worst where you aren't going to see many upsets (summer 2004, this one, series, villains), and even summer 2004/series/villains had SOMETHING worth looking at. Unless the Trainers make a deep run, this contest has nothing whatsoever worth talking about and won't in any way prove that winning contests comes down to anything but sheer luck. If anything, Board 8 being a hivemind reduces everyone's chances of winning because everyone picks the same stuff.
---
> Osama bin Laden has been killed
Stupid sod. He shouldn't have used his real address on the Playstation Network.
-KWall717
#149 | UltimaterializerX | Posted 12/5/2011 2:18:41 PM | message detail | (edited)

From: LOLContests | #144
logic gets you a decent bracket, luck gets you a winning bracket.

But those winning brackets come out of a pool of decent brackets, which you can't have without logic. Luck might sometimes determine who gets 1st and 2nd, but to even get to that level you need logic.


This very topic has more than one person who backhands this awful awful logic. Hell even the Gamespot contests prove it wrong.

Has Yesmar ever actually won a prize with this wonderful logic strategy of his? I'm too lazy to check all the leaderboards, but I'm guessing no.
---
`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.~*ST*~.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·´¯`·.,¸¸,.·
"I'm beta and an Ulti stalker." -VincentLauw
#150 | LeonhartFour | Posted 12/5/2011 2:18:46 PM | message detail

From: UltimaterializerX | #148
The entire stats topic laughed when I said Melee would win D128, and I laughed at them in return all the way through playing my free games.


Hey, I picked Melee to win Division 128, and you know my fanboyism for FFX knows no bounds!

(Of course, I also had Kingdom Hearts > Metroid Prime in the upper half and I had Mario 3 winning the whole contest, so my bad predictions outweighed that good prediction!)
---
"I couldn't stand a day without a past or future. I need to live each moment to keep fighting here and now."