I'm just going to interect something real quick...
Based
on what we've seen, if Mario remained constant and this % holds then
Mega Man remained rather constant as well, while Link rose. I'd say
that nothing fishy needs to be going on, but it still doesn't explain
Tidus.
Of course, there's always the possibility that Square
vs. Nintendo matches are always closer than they should be, as if they
defy statistics. It would make sense, of course, because people want to
see the best match possible. For that Tidus could have gotten more than
he should on Ganon, Ganon could have gotten more than he should have on
Magus and, well, Magus got beat down, so I don't think it was too
severe for him but he might have gotten more on him than he was
supposed to. I'd lay most of the blame on the big G-D and his match
with Magus. Some idiots probably thought it'd be terribly fun to see
Ganon be murdered by Link and voted for him when they wouldn't have
otherwise.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
Don't blame them. Look at how much fun it was watching Ganondorf get septupled by Link =)
---
SC2k4: 124/128 Rank: T-69
I just don't see how he'd be that much stronger than he was last year.
Maybe I'm wrong and there is no SFF. I just see it as highly more
likely than Link getting that much of a boost.
---
It's.... over.
You know what would be great? A 3rd place match. It would shut up all
the people in favor of retiring Clink, we'd get to see a good
inter-Noble Nine match, and it would help make the XS more accurate.
---
"Fargus' pirate crew makes women smile and villains revile!" ~ Cap'n Fargus, Fire Emblem
" I would say that maybe it really is the pictures. "
Honestly,
I completely agree. While pictures might not be as much of a factor for
other characters, the different Links obviously have different
popularity.
This could really explain how several things
happening last year, namely the vaunted "Kingdom Hearts Factor." In my
opinion, the KHF has been greatly exagerated. While it certainly
increased the respective popularities of Cloud and Sephiroth, and other
Square characters, KHF also included the percentage that Link decreased
last year.
Because, let's face it, one of the most important
structures of the X-Stats is based on Link staying equal between
contest '02 and '03. I think Link's performance this year proves that
he decreased last year rather than staying equal, and Link has now
returned to his '02 popularity.
Cloud has stayed more or less
equal to his '03 self. The question remains, can Cloud from '03 beat a
Link that is perhaps slightly stronger than his '02 form?
---
Currently Supporting: Link and Samus.
"I do read sometimes." Mat Cauthon, The Wheel of Time.
FourthDeus, you are digging yourself into a whole. I explained in the
last topic that SFF doesn't necessarily mean that they have to be from
the same company. However, you have to admit that the matches are
different outside of Square vs. Nintendo matches. Link and Mega Man DO
share a fanbase.... It's not the same SFF that has been called before,
but there are MANY MANY people who like both, and just prefer Link.
A
LOT of these matches are the results of that. You just can't factor
that in. You have to use common sense. The only characters who seem to
have their own distinct fanbase are RPG characters, mainly Square.
Anyways,
I explained it better in the last topic. I have to go to class soon....
But remember, this contest is RELATIVE, the stats can only be taken so
far. They are VERY useful if you know how to account for factors that
can't be determined through statistics.
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
irriadin, I gave a FULL explanation about that topic for the 2k3 stats.
I don't really agree with the Link staying constant thing. I gave a
detailed reasoning but it mostly went ignored.... I really wanted to
post it after the contest, but someone said what's the point of posting
a theory or argument if I was gonna wait until I was proved right
*coughRPGuycough*..... But I've already said that the different Link's
DO draw a different opinion and he's probably the ONLY character who
pic truly matters because of such an opinion.
I
don't think X and Mega Man would make a different because both are
extremely popular and really similar as well. Even if you don't agree,
you HAVE to admit that there's a strong opinion about Cel shaded Link
in Wind Waker or Nintendo wouldn't have "addressed" the issue like they
said they did.
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
You know what would be great? A 3rd place match. It would shut up
all the people in favor of retiring Clink, we'd get to see a good
inter-Noble Nine match, and it would help make the XS more accurate.
Good idea. I'd have Mega Man over Samus in my bracket if it was running for this one, but would pick Samus to win it now.
---
Jon Thomson - 128 and out
Nominate Ridley for Summer Contest 2005
I think you'd need to see Mega Man and Samus face each other, and then
have the winner take on Sephiroth to see where they stand.
---
It's.... over.
Seeing how Megaman's salad days were on NES and early SNES, I can see
how the two fanbases can rejoin. But does the common segment between
the two fanbases favor Link that much? That's a bit hard to swallow for
some reason. After all, you can't get much more of a common fanbase
between two powerhouses like Link and Mario, and Mario wasn't
handicapped any despite his fanbase virtually being Link's as well. So
why would Megaman suffer this much?
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 120/128 - Matches: 56/60 - Rank: 00433/33221 - Final 4: LINK, Megaman, CLOUD, Samus
"You know what would be great? A 3rd place match."
I have always thought that. Proposed the idea last year to use it as an extra tie breaker.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
"But does the common segment between the two fanbases favor Link that much?"
I
loved both series when I was younger. I voted Mega Man today because I
wanted him to look better (not that my one vote does much) but I love
the Zelda series much, much more and would have voted for Link if I
thought Mega Man even had a shot at winning. The original Zelda was the
first game to sell a million for a reason, in its day it was the best
game around, bar none, and I don't think there was a game that could
top it in that generation until Super Mario Bros 3.
So yaeh,
if we're saying that there's a fairly large old school gamer sect that
is a bit more casual than myself, they would deffinitely favor Zelda.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
Ignoring all the flaming for a moment, does this mean that Crono > MegaMan?
---
If you add monster truck tires to the Pope-mobile, religion suddenly becomes funny - SSJ3 Popo
A third place match would be great. Look at last year too, Sephiroth v Link would have been fantastic.
---
SC2K4: 124/128
Todays Pick: Link
Ignoring all the flaming for a moment, does this mean that Crono > MegaMan?
In
the extrapolated stats, I believe so. In reality, I doubt it. I see
Crono as taking advantage of the "Not again, Ceej" factor, which may
have artificially increased his power this contest. That's not to say
that I don't think that the Silent Death isn't still Noble, but I'd
pick Mega in a head-to-head match without hesitation.
---
Edge Eblan faces his greatest challenge to date at www.rpgdl.com - getting a piece of Emerald WEAPON!
Hey, is Slowflake doing a winners/losers post anytime soon? I don't
want to take his copyrighted work, but maybe I will write my opinions
on the more significant characters in the contest...
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
That's not to say that I don't think that the Silent Death
Sounds like an appropriate nickname for Link. O.o
---
M-me? Queen ***** of the Universe?
This is the happiest day of my life. ~ smitelf
Link isn't exactly SILENT..... he just doesn't speak words... He does
have a lot to say though. If that makes any sense.... o_O
Well actually, he does say "come on" in Wind Waker (-_-)
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
I'll probably do one next week. And Ulti is doing the match-by-match
perspective... so yeah, there's not much room left for originality, but
opinions are always welcome.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 120/128 - Matches: 56/60 - Rank: 00433/33221 - Final 4: LINK, Megaman, CLOUD, Samus
What kills me is that theoretically, every match has at least some
level of SFF. Somewhere out there, there is some Joe who's played games
belonging to both characters and happens to like both characters in any
given match.
Statistically
speaking, there will always be at least one person who could account
for SFF, even if it's as insignificant in the long run as
0.00000000000001% of the vote total. People shouldn't be trying to
argue whether SFF exists...people should be trying to decide what
characters garner enough SFF to make it relevant enough to vary an
outcome by a significant amount.
I'm familiar with every
character here this year with the exception of Laharl and Tanner. That
being said, I like the characters from each game listed with the
exception of Squall. I think Megaman 2 is one of the best games ever. I
voted for Megaman over Link. I have Link in my bracket. I like
Sephiroth more than Cloud. I voted for Cloud with Cloud in my bracket
as well. I also have Cloud beating Link and will vote for Cloud over
Link, however I will vote for Samus over Cloud, despite having Cloud
win my bracket. And in all cases, I'll vote for anyone over Squall
because I absolutely hate him with a passion (and no, I won't go into
any arguments as to why, because everyone's entitled to their own
opinion).
So what does that make me? A prime example for 62
potential SFF votes (not counting Snake Vs. Tanner and Vyse vs.
Laharl)...and also an example of potential reverse-SFF or even
anti-vote (anyone against Squall). So why does SFF not exist again?
---
"I don't know who you are but I thank you for arousing me." -- Terranigma
I guess I'm a little late for the discussion..
But
if you can't see why there is Link/Megaman SFF, and use an example such
as Snake/Tanner to "prove" every match has SFF, then you are VERY
closed minded.
EVERY match has SFF to a degree, because there
are people who like both. But in most matches, it simply doesn't make
that big of a difference.
But in Link/Megaman, we have two VERY
popular characters. Chances are, almost everybody here likes Link and
likes Megaman. Therefor, there is a LOT of overlap between the fanbases.
Who
cares WHAT its from, its not "system SFF" "game SFF" "series SFF" "era
SFF" "genre SFF" its frickin POPULARITY. They are both extremely
popular and have very conflicting fanbases. Is that too hard to imagine?
And
can you also see that there would be more SFF in Link/MM than in
Seph/MM? Stop nitpicking the stats and dates and systems, etc., because
every person is different. Generalize the type of person who likes MM
and Seph, what type of games they play, etc., and you SHOULD come to
the conclusion that there is less overlap between Seph and MM than
there is between Link and MM.
And yes, there is overlap
between Tanner and Snake. But not a lot. That's one of the WORST
arguments I've seen on these topics.
Tomorrow, Cloud will not "take" as much percent from Samus as Link is "taking" from Megaman.
The
x-stats to me are no good besides seeing what characters are popular,
not to predict down to the percent what a character will do. Every
frickin match has some sort of new factor to it, can't anybody admit
that stats aren't perfect, or even close to it? If everything is a new
factor, combined with overperforming and underperforming, doesn't that
just shout out to you "hey look, our stats suck!" I mean seriously,
adjusting characters for overperformance? Thats like saying "well... IF
he got a different percent, then it makes these other matches make
sense. They don't actually make sense, but hey, lets just pretend the
match happened in a way so everything would make sense, change the
percents around, and then use it to (incorrectly) predict percentages
next year!!!!"
That's my rant *puts up flame shield*
---
Score: 91/96
Link, Megaman, Cloud, Samus / Link, Cloud / Cloud
Link getting SFF on Mega?
lmao, riiiiiiiiiight....that MUST be it...Mega can't be getting crushed without something crazy going on....
And
to say that Link won't beat Cloud because he never has before makes
about at much sense as saying that Cloud won't beat Mario, for the same
reason.
---
SC2K4 Score: 110/120 Next Tough Pick: Link over Sep...Cloud.
CATS is more well-developed than Cloud. ~ A very wise man, UltarEmpire.
I know quite a few more people that like Zelda + FF then Zelda + MM btw, so whoever wins that MUST be getting big SFF as well.
---
SC2K4 Score: 110/120 Next Tough Pick: Link over Sep...Cloud.
CATS is more well-developed than Cloud. ~ A very wise man, UltarEmpire.
To be honest with you guys, I won't put too much weight into this match.
MM has been the most INCONSISTENT performer this round, overperforming and underperforming at will.
Crono on the other hand, should be relatively constant, so I'll use that match to gauge Link's strength.
That said, if Cloud couldn't break 60% on Samus tomorrow, I'll concede that Link has the contest in the bag already.
Honestly, I really wish I have an accurate way to gauge Cloud's strength, so far he never had a "real" opponent.
---
September 29th, 2004: Once again, destiny(Cloud) has destroyed fate(Sephiroth).
Crono on the other hand, should be relatively constant,
Errrr did you see Crono v Mario III?
---
SC2K4: 124/128
Todays Pick: Link
Of course Crono is a much better opponent to gauge Link's strength
against Cloud. That should be obvious. Crono is closer to Cloud as a
character than anyone else in this contest. Squall is similar, but his
popularity isn't at Cloud's level. Sephiroth is the villain from
Cloud's game. Crono is the main protagonist of the second most popular
Square RPG as seen in the Spring 2k4 contest, and that game came out
right before Cloud's in the Square lineup. Speaking of which, I wonder
how Crono would do against Sephiroth. That would be a SFF matchup that
I would WANT to see.
And
my argument isn't one that says the extrapolated rankings are useless,
so I don't know why this is turning into a bandwagon against the stats.
By the way, stats include EVERYTHING including vote totals, etc. My
point is that you should have the common sense to factor in things that
the stats can't factor in. The extrapolated rankings should be used as
a guide, not as an instant decision.
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
I think most of us agree that the XS should be used as guidlines, not
for predicting a % to the hundreth. That's why we can still create a
difficult bracket to predict.
---
"Fargus' pirate crew makes women smile and villains revile!" ~ Cap'n Fargus, Fire Emblem
Errrr did you see Crono v Mario III?
I did, and I believe that's mostly Mario dropping.
Mario
benefits the most from the casual voters, with the huge decrease in
casual votes in this contest, Mario's strength took a big hit.
---
September 29th, 2004: Once again, destiny(Cloud) has destroyed fate(Sephiroth).
Mario made up 900 votes in the dead of the night last year. That is not the casual vote.
---
"Fargus' pirate crew makes women smile and villains revile!" ~ Cap'n Fargus, Fire Emblem
If Link does somehow continue this dominance against Link, I wonder if
last years Wind Waker pics really screwed Link over now? I mean, all
Link has been getting this year are his much better pics and he's been
thoroughly destroying EVERYONE in his path. Of course, then this could
mean that Frog did in fact do a ton better than he should have but who
knows...
If
it turns out that Cloud winning last year was in fact a fluke due to
that, then yeah, I'm all for retiring Link and calling him the most
popular character ever.
---
Chaos Knight-Cerebral Insomniac of the CoS
summoner? wtf! summoner=Yuna Taru=midgit GaryPayton LA
*If Link continues his dominance against Cloud
---
Chaos Knight-Cerebral Insomniac of the CoS
summoner? wtf! summoner=Yuna Taru=midgit GaryPayton LA
Man, it's just crazy that Link's getting more % on MM than Cloud did on Sonic.
...I mean, damn.
...damn.
---
"Thank you, Mario. But our princess is in another castle."
-Toad in Super Mario Bros.
Moltar's First Thoughts on: Link vs. Mega
Oh man, have I got alot to say here...
I
wake up and see the awesome match pic this morning of Mega killing
Link. I knew they're had to be another, so I refreshed twice and saw
the Link one. I then voted and I was like O_O. Link was destroying
Mega. I didn't think it would be this bad. Damn.
So let's see,
did Link over-perform thus far? Well, he did 1% better on CATS, SFF'd
Ganon and Yoshi into the ground. Beat Crono (who has possibly increased
about 3% since last year) by about 4% more. Now he's beating Mega by
almost 7% more than we would have last year. And what happens? People
call SFF. Well, it's much easier to believe that happened then...
Tidus
and Shadow falling down to the level between 2003 Sam and KOS-MOS, Zero
falling between 2003 Auron and Zelda, Mega himself falling to Aeris's
and Squall's levels, Snake falling to Auron and Dante, Frog's Triangle
falling to Alucard...and the rest of them falling and ranking low. This
also puts Link, Crono and Mario ahead of Mega in the stats. So...SFF or
that?
I believe there is some kind of SFF here, but not as much
as everybody is probably thinking. Is it so hard to believe that Crono
is stronger than Mega Man? I think this is mostly Link's power here.
The guy is somehow getting more popular here. If Cloud doesn't impress
tomorrow, then Link has this thing won. His performance today is
PERFECT championship material.
I think I covered all I want to say...now onto today's match pics!
http://gamefaqs.com/shared/sum04b61.php
(Mega's pic) WOW! Look at Mega Man. I like Link's expression as he's getting shot.
(Link's pic) I like the other slightly more, but this one is good to. This pic tells us how the match is going too.
---
Sephiroth vs. Sly - http://www.stripcreator.com/comics/Moltar
Link vs. Mega Man - Bracket: Link - Vote: Link (124/128)
Mario benefits the most from the casual voters, with the huge
decrease in casual votes in this contest, Mario's strength took a big
hit.
'Casual' on this site is different from being an
average person. Most casual gamers dislike Mario, which is why they own
a PS2. The loss of casual vote on this site should hurt characters like
Cloud, Snake, and Tommy Vercetti. All characters that are extremely
popular with the casual gamer, but neither Cloud nor Tommy have shown
any real signs of loss.
Mario made up 900 votes in the dead of the night last year. That is not the casual vote.
That's
what you call "cheat votes", he didn't do that against Sephy the next
round, nor did he ever do that on any other opponent.
---
September 29th, 2004: Once again, destiny(Cloud) has destroyed fate(Sephiroth).
http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=8&topic=16631136
I've made updates up until this point for the match...
Link's best update this match:
"Updates Left: 78
Votes per update needed for Mega Man to catch up: 47.706
Link's % last update: 72.54%
Total Votes so far: 11109"
Mega Man's best update this match:
"Updates Left: 87
Votes per update needed for Mega Man to catch up: 18.828
Link's % last update: 60.30%
Total Votes so far: 5570"
Ouch. O.o
---
M-me? Queen ***** of the Universe?
This is the happiest day of my life. ~ smitelf
The best thing about all this is seeing the x-stats that some of you
kiss and make love to at night being beaten down with the ugly stick
like a fat kid in dodgeball.
That being said, here is another shameless plug for a Nobleless Nine Contest next year!
Ah,
never mind...the fanboys will never allow such a thing, they will cry
and not come to the site...for maybe 10 minutes, til their fanboy love
brings them back...
Sad, eh?
---
Steve Illumina: The Elite Satirist of GameFAQ's
SC2K4: 135/144 MK Deception: Oct 5!
'Casual' on this site is different from being an average person.
Most casual gamers dislike Mario, which is why they own a PS2. The loss
of casual vote on this site should hurt characters like Cloud, Snake,
and Tommy Vercetti. All characters that are extremely popular with the
casual gamer, but neither Cloud nor Tommy have shown any real signs of
loss.
First, I agree that casuals in GameFAQs is not what I would call an average person IRL.
But, compare the average vote totals between 2003 and 2004, you'll notice a huge difference.
There's only 2 possible explanation for that fact:
1. GameFAQs is dropping in popularity, resulting in less visits to the site, which turns to less vote totals.
2. Many "average person" was interested in the SC 2003, but are no longer interested in this year's SC.
Considering that I haven't notice the popularity of this site going down, I'd say that #2 is most likely reason.
Ask an average person out there, and more will recognize Mario than anybody else in this contest.
Their apparent lost of interest in this year's SC has hurt Mario big time.
---
September 29th, 2004: Once again, destiny(Cloud) has destroyed fate(Sephiroth).
1. GameFAQs is dropping in popularity, resulting in less visits to the site, which turns to less vote totals.
This is correct, the site dropped a lot in poularity after the redesign.
---
SC2K4: 124/128
Todays Pick: Link
*popularity
---
SC2K4: 124/128
Todays Pick: Link
I don't think there is SFF in today's match; I just simply think Mega Man is underperforming.
---
Vote in my Pseudo SpC2K5 bracket: http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=8&topic=16613027
Feat: LttP, SoTN, Final Fantasy 8, Super Metroid
This is correct, the site dropped a lot in poularity after the redesign.
I really don't think so, if anything we now have GS users browsing here as well.
But we'll see, Cloud vs. Link will show us the light.
---
September 29th, 2004: Once again, destiny(Cloud) has destroyed fate(Sephiroth).
Ask an average person out there, and more will recognize Mario than anybody else in this contest.
Out
of anybody, that's true, but on GameFAQs, a casual visitor is just as
likely to recognize Cloud, Crono, Sephiroth, etc. Mario dropping
because of the "casual vote" disappearing doesn't hold much water with
me.
---
"Fargus' pirate crew makes women smile and villains revile!" ~ Cap'n Fargus, Fire Emblem
Tournament Semifinals: Final 4 - Match 62 – (1)Cloud vs. (2)Samus
Moltar’s Analysis
Cloud - Aeris, Tifa…nah… but Yuffie…>=)
Round 1 – vs. Duke (Cloud: 80.19% - Duke: 19.81%)
Round 2 – vs. Vyse (Cloud: 81.41% - Vyse: 18.59%)
Round 3 – vs. Squall (Cloud: 76.21% - Squall: 23.79%)
Round 4 – vs. Sephiroth (Cloud: 56% - Sephiroth: 44%)
Cloud performs much better against Seph this year. Watch out Link, Cloud’s ready to defend!
Samus - Still praying for that Suitless pic…
Round 1 – vs. Lara (Samus: 82.39% - Lara: 17.61%)
Round 2 – vs. Sam (Sam: 19.03% – Samus: 80.97%)
Round 3 – vs. Sora (Sora: 35.15% - Samus: 65.85%)
Round 4 – vs. Sonic (Sonic: 57.19% - Samus: 42.81%)
Nice job by Samus. Sonic put up a fight, but Samus is too much.
Wow,
we were hoping for a possible Samus upset, but it doesn’t look like it
will happen. Cloud got 66% on Sonic last year, and even if you factor
in a Sonic increase, Samus would still have to get in the low 60’s to
win. It shouldn’t mean Samus won’t put up a fight though.
Blargh, another boring analysis. I promise to make the finals interesting, maybe even funny!
Moltar’s Bracket says: Cloud will win
Moltar’s Prediction is: Cloud 55% - Samus 45%
Ulti's Analysis
As
cool as it was to think Samus could win this, we all know that she
won't. Still, it will be fun to see her nab the lead after a few
seconds. How Samus does in this match will also be rather interesting.
The better she does, the more likely it is that Link has the title
wrapped up. Samus will do better than what Xsts say; it's a matter of how much.
Ulti's Bracket/Prediction - Cloud/Cloud with 58.28%
---
Sephiroth vs. Sly - http://www.stripcreator.com/comics/Moltar
Link vs. Mega Man - Bracket: Link - Vote: Link (124/128)
Again, I wouldn't put too much stock into this.
And you
sir, would be an idiot to not put stock into a killing of this
proportion. If you think Cloud has a snowball's chance in hell your
insane.
---
/The Hunter - Log 10.023.7/
A considerable bounty will go to the unit who delivers Aran to Command. Dead or alive, it matters not.
I think somebody mentioned that Link is doing better against Mega Man than Cloud did against Sonic. That is insane.
---
"Fargus' pirate crew makes women smile and villains revile!" ~ Cap'n Fargus, Fire Emblem
So you've never met people who like both Zelda and Mega Man? The
fanbases obviously overlap because they're both extremely popular.
Being from different companie doesn't make a difference.
You're
doing nothing but pulling for anything you can make up now. You want to
try to pass this off as some kind of odd SFF? Riight. Why don't we just
call each match two overlapping fanbases? Of course they would
have to meet your criteria of being "popular". This is the most asinine
thing I've heard, seriously.
---
/The Hunter - Log 10.023.7/
A considerable bounty will go to the unit who delivers Aran to Command. Dead or alive, it matters not.
ChichiriMuyo -
Of course, there's always
the possibility that Square vs. Nintendo matches are always closer than
they should be, as if they defy statistics.
Tidus vs Ganondorf
?Magus vs Link?
Squall vs Samus
?Sora vs Samus?
I
have a feeling that it's not all Square vs Nintendo matches but mostly
those with the Square character loosing that are off with the loosing
character overperforming. It would explain Tidus and Squall dropping
(to a certain extent), Magus being SFF'd to hell and Sora being closer
to Samus than expected...
---
SpC2k4 - Triple Crown Winner! (Spread Betting, Betting, Oracle),
SC2k4 Oracle Challenge - Topic ID : 16596072
Serious question for all:
The hell do we
mean when we say underperforming and overperforming? This isn't college
football. Opponents don't play down to the level of fodder, and
mid-carders don't rise to the occasion against elites.
We use
these terms to describe in our mind what makes the results make sense.
I am not calling anyone out, as I no doubt have used these phrases on
countless occasions also. But I am just curious as to what everyone
thinks about the terms themselves. They theoretically fit, as they
describe what we are witnessing. But in the context in which we use
them, they make about as much sense as letting R. Kelly babysit.
---
SC2k4: 124/128 Rank: T-69
Oops, ignore those Samus/Sonic numbers. I forgot to update them before I posted.
---
Sephiroth vs. Sly - http://www.stripcreator.com/comics/Moltar
Link vs. Mega Man - Bracket: Link - Vote: Link (124/128)