I can't believe there are people honestly just throwing Mega Man's
chances right out the door based on a match like this. Honestly, it's
like people suddenly forget that he destroyed Tidus with Link like
numbers.
If
anything these said people should just wait until Mega Man/Snake until
they actually form an opinion on his chances, because they are so
inconsistent that they can't watch one match and keep a steady opinion.
RPGuy
and ExquisiteSamuari are probably the best examples of someone who is
more or less ignoring this match and waiting until something more solid
like Snake in less than a week instead of throwing out asinine questions/claims.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Besides, if anybody deserves a second chance for recieving a screw
job it's Raiden. Again, I'm not even a fan of the Metal Gear Solid
games but I do think Raiden was screwed more than anyone else in
contest history.
Its a tossup between Knuckles and Raiden there.
I find it highly unlikely for MM to have increased to Link's level, and yet still the same strength relative to Zero.
So you'd rather accept Tidus/Shadow falling to Yoshi's level without any explanation?
---
Link (2002) --> Clinkeroth (2003) --> Megamus Clinkeroth (2004)
Supporting Samus over Mega Man for the finals!
Honestly, it's like people suddenly forget that he destroyed Tidus with Link like numbers.
Well, when you suddenly perform worse than you would have been expected to in 2003, that tends to happen.
Zero is pushing for 44%. He's still gaining percentage like crazy.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
Sweet Sixteen: Duel of Heroes vs. Cloud Strife
No he hasn't. There was a great deal of uncertianty in that fourpack
and we won't really know if he held the same strength until the final
match is over.
The only thing that looked different about
Sonic was his percentage against an estimated Terry Bogard. When you
look at 2003 Sonic to a lesser adjusted Terry you would get roughly the
same results. Considering he performed identically to what the X-sts
had Sonic/Ryu at I don't know why he would go up.
SFAC came out after his match with KOS. If it came out before it, for all we know Ryu may have beaten he much worse.
I
was a big supporter of SFAC doing something, but after witnessing
Sonic/Ryu I have to question its relevance in the overall scheme of
things. Sure, it's still possible for it to have affected something but
Sonic being stronger as well? Does it not seem odd that they would each
be strong enough to have an exact outcome as the extrapolated standings predicted?
Sure,
and neither does Ryu, yet you yourself were so adamant about SFAC
giving Ryu a boost that you thought h may even pass up his expected 45%
on Sonic.
Yes, I was a very big supporter of SFAC doing
something but at the same time after that match I didn't give much more
thought to it. The reason being that the match went exactly like it was expected too. There wasn't any oddity throughout that match.
You
only disagree with me because you dislike Sonic characters. It really
looks bad when you disagree with someone who is using the same logical
evidence you recently used.
Why would I be against Sonic
increasing? It would help Ryu, and later on Dante, rise up in the
standings as well. I'm not anti-Sonic and then just neutral on the
other characters. I like Ryu and Dante.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Well, when you suddenly perform worse than you would have been expected to in 2003, that tends to happen.
That's
because people are in a word, stupid. They see one thing that obviously
isn't concrete stats and they go nuts. In a match where things
obviously aren't "right" in the sense that we have two characters from
the same fanbase. Some just refuse to acknowledge that things may not
be exactly as they look in this match, but rather it's Mega Man
standing no chance.
Then again, these are the same people who thought he'd do lesser against Tidus; these same people will also change their opinion once he faces Snake.
Zero is pushing for 44%. He's still gaining percentage like crazy.
Great
for Zero. I love Mega Man to death, but Zero is also in my top 10
favorite characters so I can't help but like this. Reason being? It
says nothing about Mega Man's chances at beating Link. At the very
least people could wait until something more solid, like next round.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
I can't believe there are people honestly just throwing Mega Man's chances right out the door based on a match like this.
Mega Man never had a chance in my book. His job was to beat all his opponents up to Link, and bow out gracefully then.
When I think of Mega Man, "Winner" does not come to mind. Final Four sounds more like it...
---
Snake vs. Tanner - http://www.stripcreator.com/comics/Moltar
Mega Man vs. Zero - Bracket: Mega - Vote: Mega (68/72)
Or maybe Mega Man overperformed? For some reason, people decided
that Sephiroth overperforming against Link in 2002 was the only
explanation for the WDF.
It was also a very, very stupid
reason. You see, your excuse that Tidus collapses against elite's is in
the same logic as Sephiroth overperforming against Link. Both of them
sound totally stupid. (no offense to you, your in no way stupid)
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Then please explain how Zero goes from 48% on the weakest link in the
Noble Nine to being able to beat anyone not named Megamus Clinkeroth. I
refuse to believe that Zero is getting nearly 10% of raw reverse SFF on
Mega Man, especially when this lines up with 2003.
I
have my reasons for doubting Mega Man. Whether you accept them or not
has nothing to do with it. You'll stand by your stuff, and I'll stand
by mine.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
Sweet Sixteen: Duel of Heroes vs. Cloud Strife
But as I said before, this match pushes me to lean on Tidus dropping instead.
So
you believe both Tidus and Shadow fell like rocks instead of Mega Man
increasing? There is absolutely no reason for either of those two
characters to drop. On the other hand, I've given plenty of reason for
Mega Man's increase; but this is Tidus dropping?
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Tidus AND Shadow drop to YOSHI levels if Mega Man didn't increase.
---
Link (2002) --> Clinkeroth (2003) --> Megamus Clinkeroth (2004)
Supporting Samus over Mega Man for the finals!
"Zero's been performing as expected all day long and you're still on denial...
"Zero still has shown himself to be performing as expected"
Yeah,
I'm in denial. I mean, hell, I said he's performing as expected, but
I'm denying that fact. Okay, sure, whatever. The sentance wasn't th
best I've written, but it still clearly says that he is performing as
expected.
And you were WAY off on Max.
"Any increase on 2 different chars can't be soo proportional that it looks like none of them has changed."
Funny,
tell that to Shadow, who may have significantly decresed almost exactly
proportional to another character in the last year, should MM's
performance against Tidus not be a fluke while leaving him at the same
level as last year projects.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
I can't believe there are people honestly just throwing Mega Man's
chances right out the door based on a match like this. Honestly, it's
like people suddenly forget that he destroyed Tidus with Link like
numbers.
As I said before, 1 match said nothing, 2 and I'll consider him having a legit chance.
RPGuy
and ExquisiteSamuari are probably the best examples of someone who is
more or less ignoring this match and waiting until something more solid
like Snake in less than a week instead of throwing out asinine
questions/claims.
This match is controversial for sure, but why should it be COMPLETELY ignored?
Zero and MM's fanbases should be unique enough to make any SFF negligible, if there's even any.
Sorry HM, but I've never considered MM a thread to Link.
His match against Tidus doesn't convince me, and this match convinced me the other way around.
MM (and therefore Zero), could've easily increased.
But most likely not enough to be considered a thread to Link.
---
Real monsters are not those who has the power to destroy, but those who has the intention to do so.
This isn't reverse SFF. Mega Man and Zero are two different characters from two entirely different series.
Ulti,
don't act that stupid. This is a match that completely caters to the
Mega Man fanbase. I don't care if they are two different series, if you
think they don't share the same fans your crazy.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
To an extent they ARE different fanbases. Zero is the "new-school" fanbase while Mega Man is the "old-school" fanbase.
---
I bow down to smitelf, Queen ***** of the Universe. Her intelligence, wit, and sexiness have consume’d me.
Tidus AND Shadow drop to YOSHI levels if Mega Man didn't increase.
The way I see it, neither has to increase or decrease.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
Sweet Sixteen: Duel of Heroes vs. Cloud Strife
"Its a tossup between Knuckles and Raiden there."
At least we get a fair idea of Knux's strength each year, we haven't got one damn clue about Raiden's though.
"So you'd rather accept Tidus/Shadow falling to Yoshi's level without any explanation?"
Obviously,
because two characters would more likely fall proportionately than two
characters gaining proportionately, using the "logic" someone just
tried to shove down my throat. I mean, hell, one of them essentially
starred in a new game (Shadow is only second to Sonic in terms of
storyline importance now) and the other one's name was mentioned
constantly in another new game. Both of those games also sold fairly
well, mind you. But yes, obviously they dropped proportionately over
the last year despite everything workign against them dropping even
though it's impossible for two characters to increase proportionately.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
Dear Lord, the stats are going to be so screwed up this year...
---
***Married to UltimaterializerX on 5/21/04***
Official Queen ***** of the Universe! Contest Score: 68/72, Next Winner: Mega Man
Oh, and I really think that HM should just face the facts:
By
all means, present me these facts that I'm just not facing. I have yet
to see one thing in this topic that is clearly factual and makes Mega
Man's chances drop like a rock--without some oddity to go along with
it, of course.
Mega Man. Will. Not. Beat. Link.
Really? I'm inclined to believe the opposite and with good reason.
Championship
contenders are NOT supposed to be reverse SFF'ed; in fact, championship
contenders aren't supposed to show any weaknesses. Period.
Mario
made it to the finals by beating Cloud and Crono. Up until that point
he hadn't shown one sign of domination, minus the SFF on Donkey Kong.
You have to concentrate on one thing at a time, and if he beats
Link--his main goal--then he certainly has a great shot at taking the
finals. His finals is basically the final four, because if he wins I
don't think he'd lose to whoever is in the finals.
If there
really isn't any SFF in this match, then MM would have to be getting
68% or more before I'd consider him a threat to Link.
Mega Man never needed 68% in order to have a shot against Link.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Well, if your statement holds, then MM has NO chance in hell of beating Link.
Like
hell. There is absolutely no way whatsoever to tell me Mega Man doesn't
have a chance against Link. You have two totally contradicting
performances by 2003 stats and it's all on what you want to
choose on your stance. Most seem to going toward Mega Man/Zero despite
how it's easily setup to have some strange workings in it and NOT Mega
Man staying stable.
I'm with ya ChichiriMuyo. Zero's a damn beast.
I've just been saying such things for a while now, but everyone labels me as a fanboy. ;p
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
I'm not acting stupid. That comment was made because I'm one example of
many who have played the original Mega Man games, but not Mega Man X.
Not to say that they don't share fans, but I would assume the fanbase
is smart enough to realize that Mega Man X is different from Mega Man,
and would thus vote accordingly. It was a compliment -_-
From: redline15 | Posted: 9/21/2004 8:49:08 PM | Message Detail
two thoughts.
1: why couldn't this have happened to magus...?
The quickest way into my good book is to say something good about Magus =)
2: no matter what "factor" is behind these results...proto man definitely deserves another shot at this thing.
I would also boot Protoman in favor of someone else from the MM series, namely Bass or Wily.
---
Winner of the Spring 2004 'Best. Game. Ever.' Contest
*Married to smitelf on 5/21/04* ++SCC GOD++
Unfortunately for MM, just being at his 2003 level won't help him.
This match needs to show an "irregular" result very heavily in his
favor if he wants to stand a chance against Link.
Wait, did I just see... oh yes, yes it was a major overperformance last round!
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
"Does it not seem odd that they would each be strong enough to have an exact outcome as the extrapolated standings predicted?"
Does
it seem odd that not one but two characters would have a new game in
the last year and not rise in the slightest went Dante increased from
DMC2 which is generally considered to be a bad game and was expected to
have actually hurt him?
"I'm not anti-Sonic and then just neutral on the other characters."
But you are anti-sonic
'Both of them sound totally stupid"
Damn right they do.
"48% on the weakest link in the Noble Nine"
Um,
that's pretty damn stong. Only 4 Noble Nine characters are above him,
and we have yet to see if Zero will rank ahead of Sonic. But then
again, Magus ranked ahead of Sonic, so it's not that hard. Two of the
four ahead of him last year were SFF'd out this year, so we couldn't
begin to guess hwo they'd rank in legit matches this year, and the
other two faced a similar opponent. Maybe Zero was supposed to be ahead
of those two all along.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
I'm waiting (yes, waiting, novel concept, and one I'm usually
against) until Mega/Snake to make another conclusion about Mega Man.
This match does not jive with Mega/Tidus in the least, and I'm much
more willing to use the results of Mega/Tidus instead of this one.
Thank you, logical one. That's the best thing in the world someone could do.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Yeah, I'm in denial. I mean, hell, I said he's performing as
expected, but I'm denying that fact. Okay, sure, whatever. The sentance
wasn't th best I've written, but it still clearly says that he is
performing as expected.
I'm talking about the part where you told me to wait until the end of this match as if the result could be any different.
Funny,
tell that to Shadow, who may have significantly decresed almost exactly
proportional to another character in the last year, should MM's
performance against Tidus not be a fluke while leaving him at the same
level as last year projects.
Ever heard of Mario over Cloud in 2002?
Flukes like that DO happen.
Dropping proportionally, although very unlikely, is more believable since chars do age.
And drop due to time can be proportional.
Note that I'm NOT claiming that this is the case with those 2.
---
Real monsters are not those who has the power to destroy, but those who has the intention to do so.
"The way I see it, neither has to increase or decrease."
If
Tidus and Shadow didn't move then Mega Man goes up, a lot. If Mega Man
doesn't move then Tidus and Shadow go down, a lot. There's no way
around it.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
It's also easier to lean toward Mega Man/Zero because it follows what
the stats predict, and we've already seen an example this year of a
match between two characters in the same fanbase that didn't have SFF
in Vivi-Sephiroth.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
Sweet Sixteen: Duel of Heroes vs. Cloud Strife
Possibly under 56% before it is over? Just... yikes. And given that
I do not believe reverse SFF to exist... thanks for coming Mega Man,
enjoy another Final Four, and don't let the door hit ya on the way out
Link *****slaps you like the ho you are. Can I get an amen.
So
because you believe it doesn't exist it will cease to exist? Spare me.
I'm not saying this is what is happening, but there is no denying it
being a possibility. As for his chance against Link, I still cannot
wait until the performance against Mega Man has the majority switching
their opinion on the matter yet again. I can't believe everyone
suddenly is looking at this as a major weakness as last round as a
"fluke".
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
He never had a chance to begin with.
He most certainly does have a chance against Link.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
This match makes me think that the majority of Mega Man fans here on
GameFAQs are classic Mega Man fans. This match doesn't really seem like
Mega Man vs. Zero. It seems like Mega Man vs. Mega Man X.
---
SC2K4 Score: 64/72
Today's Pick: Mega Man
Ever heard of Mario over Cloud in 2002?
Flukes like that DO happen.
Except
that was by no means a fluke. Wasn't it curious how Mario and Link were
the two finalists in that contest? Let me tell you about a little thing
called the "Kingdom Hearts Factor". Kingdom Hearts was a game with
cameos by Sephiroth and Cloud. After its release, Sephiroth and Cloud
dominated 2003.
---
I bow down to smitelf, Queen ***** of the Universe. Her intelligence, wit, and sexiness have consume’d me.
There's no way around it.
Sure there is. I've already explained it a million times. Whether or not you believe it is another matter entirely.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
Sweet Sixteen: Duel of Heroes vs. Cloud Strife
I'm not acting stupid. That comment was made because I'm one example
of many who have played the original Mega Man games, but not Mega Man
X. Not to say that they don't share fans, but I would assume the
fanbase is smart enough to realize that Mega Man X is different from
Mega Man, and would thus vote accordingly. It was a compliment -_-
It
doesn't matter if this is X or not. There are still plenty of people
who could vote for Zero over the classic Mega Man and be a fan of both
of them. This isn't a different series in the sense of something like
Mario and Zelda. I take it most would know this is the classical Mega
Man, but that doesn't mean they don't like him and Zero more.
Heck, I've seen all sorts of combinations from people.
X > Zero > Mega Man
Mega Man > Zero > X
Zero > X > Mega Man
etc.
etc.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Wow, I never imagined that this match would spark more controversy than Mario vs Crono III...
It's an SFF match. We don't use SFF matches when we do stats. I don't care what happens in them.
Somebody
brought up Vivi earlier. Vivi's strength is based on DK's strength last
year, which I have never really bought. I still think something fishy
may have happened in that match.
---
Link (2002) --> Clinkeroth (2003) --> Megamus Clinkeroth (2004)
Supporting Samus over Mega Man for the finals!
It's also easier to lean toward Mega Man/Zero because it follows
what the stats predict, and we've already seen an example this year of
a match between two characters in the same fanbase that didn't have SFF
in Vivi-Sephiroth.
Of course, people fail to see that there
can and will be something odd that could happen in matches with
characters from the same fanbase. People want to take the easiest way
out and just claim that Link has his spot in the finals against Cloud.
You'll notice that Sephiroth/Vivi is one example, but that's why it's
called the exception and not the rule.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
I don't think we should use this match to determine Mega Man's
strength. Mega Man already had given us a hint that he had gotten
stronger than last year by spanking Tidus, but Zero could've easily
gone up as well, though that doesn't explain the perfect X-sts match
against Tommy Vercetti.
---
SC2K4 Score: 64/72
Today's Pick: Mega Man
"Mega Man never needed 68% in order to have a shot against Link."
Heh, yeah, that was a rather rediculous number that was thrown out there.
"I've just been saying such things for a while now, but everyone labels me as a fanboy. ;p "
If they call me a fanboy they don't have a leg to stand on, and I say Zero's quite a beast.
"I'm talking about the part where you told me to wait until the end of this match as if the result could be any different."
The
final result can always be different. Look at the final result of
MC/Frog and compare it to this time of day, there's a bit of a diffence
there. There's always room for change, and you'd have to be an idiot to
deny that fact.
"Ever heard of Mario over Cloud in 2002?
Flukes like that DO happen."
No,
never heard of it. I mean, hell, I was only here that day and saw the
*****ing and moaning about PGC all day long the day after it, but I
never heard of it. Sarcasm aside, we've pretty much figured out exactly
why that may have gone down the way it did. What exactly did Mega Man
have to give him a one time fluke?
"Dropping proportionally, although very unlikely, is more believable since chars do age."
Yes, and they fade out of memory after a years time, especially when a new game is released in their series, right?
"Note that I'm NOT claiming that this is the case with those 2."
BS, if you're saying that Mega Man isn't any stronger now then he was last year that's exactly what you're saying.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
Does it seem odd that not one but two characters would have a new
game in the last year and not rise in the slightest went Dante
increased from DMC2 which is generally considered to be a bad game and
was expected to have actually hurt him?
I can see them not
rising, but staying equal to a new game as opposed to rising in so well
that the outcome stayed the exact same. I'm not saying it's not
possible, just that it doesn't seem that likely to me.
But you are anti-sonic
I don't like him, but that doesn't take away from the fact I like Ryu and Dante.
Damn right they do.
Thank you. Someone else who sees both as totally idiotic.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Wait.. magus had a solo game in Japan? Proof!
He didn't
have a solo game, but he was a big part of the game. I can't name the
game due to possible spoiler warnings, but if you really want to know,
you can find it here:
http://www.gamefaqs.com/console/snes/data/28941.html
Not
to say that they don't share fans, but I would assume the fanbase is
smart enough to realize that Mega Man X is different from Mega Man, and
would thus vote accordingly.
1. No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the public. - Paraphrased, P.T. Barnum.
2.
As I've said time and time again, Ceej has out and out said that the
name "Mega Man" in the summer contest represents all the "Mega Man"
characters out there. Of course, as I've said before, it's obviously
just lip service for the .EXE/X/Legends fans, as Ceej has shown time
and time again.
---
Dragon Warrior vs. Dragon God: Zenithian heroine Sofia faces off against God Emperor Fou-Lu at www.rpgdl.com.
Except that was by no means a fluke. Wasn't it curious how Mario and
Link were the two finalists in that contest? Let me tell you about a
little thing called the "Kingdom Hearts Factor". Kingdom Hearts was a
game with cameos by Sephiroth and Cloud. After its release, Sephiroth
and Cloud dominated 2003.
I KNEW about the KHF damn it.
But even in 2002, the final should've been Cloud vs. Link.
PGC cheated Cloud to benefit Mario, that's why I considered that match as a "fluke".
My point is that MM vs. Tidus's result could be an "exception".
And hence it's too early to say that MM has a chance against Link.
---
Real monsters are not those who has the power to destroy, but those who has the intention to do so.
"Mega Man > Zero > X"
The only logical choice. :)
"Mega Man already had given us a hint that he had gotten stronger than last year by spanking Tidus, but Zero could've easily gone up as well"
You'd have to use logic to take that possibility into consideration, some people aren't willing to do that.
"though that doesn't explain the perfect X-sts match against Tommy Vercetti."
I
wouldn't call it perfect, Tommy was a tiny bit short of that. By that
logic his gain isn't necessarily deffined proportional. Nevertheless...
GTA:DP. There ya go.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake
everybody's suggested dr. wily to replace proto man so far...but i really don't see him getting any votes.
i just don't think "crazy old man in a lab coat" will appeal to the average voter.
am i so out of touch...?
i'll admit that bass and sigma might be better choices than proto man, though.
---
redline15: blasting off at the speed of light
This match is controversial for sure, but why should it be COMPLETELY ignored?
Yes. This is a SFF match, since when are these matches ever held in high regard? That's right, never. It should have NEVER sparked this much controversy and talk as it did.
Sorry HM, but I've never considered MM a thread to Link.
His match against Tidus doesn't convince me, and this match convinced me the other way around.
I
never try to push everyone to believe that Mega Man has a shot at Link.
I just don't think people have any sort of ground to work off of when
they come off and say he doesn't have a chance this year. They'll bring
up stuff like "Oh last year he faced Sephiroth..." or today's wonderful
match "OMG! Look at the percentage! I'll ignore last year, call it a
fluke, but this round is totally screwing his chances!"
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
If Mario had still beaten Cloud, and had CJayC taken off all 3000 proxy
votes for Crono, do you think Cloud would look hella stronger than
Crono?
---
SC2K4 Score: 64/72
Today's Pick: Mega Man
One more thing to Leonhart: Mega Man was less than 2% stronger than
Sonic in 2k2. So Tidus would be expected to get roughly 40% on Mega Man
in 2k2. If that Tidus' performances on Mega and Sonic are analogous,
shouldn't Tidus have gotten closer to 40% on the Blue Bomber, not 35%?
---
Link (2002) --> Clinkeroth (2003) --> Megamus Clinkeroth (2004)
Supporting Samus over Mega Man for the finals!
My point is that MM vs. Tidus's result could be an "exception".
And hence it's too early to say that MM has a chance against Link.
Some
people are deadset on believing that was the exception yet this match
cannot be an exception. That's what kills me, people look at this match
and say Mega Man doesn't stand a chance; yet when they look at the Mega
Man/Tidus match and call it an exception.
If anything this match is more of an exception than the previous one.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
Must I mention YOSHI beating (or at least coming close too) Tidus and Shadow if Mega didn't increase again?
Good God, YOSHI!
That's like the people that think Samus' doesn't have a legitimate chance because Lara is on the level of CATS.
---
Link (2002) --> Clinkeroth (2003) --> Megamus Clinkeroth (2004)
Supporting Samus over Mega Man for the finals!
Well, Mega Man Zero 2 had been released during the contest off-season,
and it was highly acclaimed to be better than the original, so many
casual gamers could've taken interest in the Zero series, and thus,
Zero gets more popular. I'm not saying this is a fact, it's a
possibility. On the other hand, there's Mega Man X7, but no one cares
about that.
---
SC2K4 Score: 64/72
Today's Pick: Mega Man
Wow, I never imagined that this match would spark more controversy than Mario vs Crono III...
I
didn't either; after this morning I was totally expecting us to move
onto future matches with maybe a little talk here and there. We've
spent hundreds of posts discussing this matter, when there shouldn't
have even been.
---
SC2k4 Winner: Mega Man
*All bow Down to wg64Z, for He has pwnd me...again*
"PGC cheated Cloud to benefit Mario,"
LOL.
Okay, *chuckles*, assuming that we chalk it all up to PGC... then where
was MM's PGC for Tidus? I assure you, Planet Mega Man couldn't begin to
account for a 10% difference in that match. So the other MvCl oddity,
then? Where is MM's SMS? What game was released on the day of his match
that game him such a huge boost? Give me any logical reason why MM's
match agianst Tidus was a fluke that can hold up to the argument that
TODAY's match is a fluke, and I might give you a shred of credit.
"My point is that MM vs. Tidus's result could be an "exception"."
And
without any evidence or anything to even speculate with there's as much
of a chance that this is a fluke as there is of that being a fluke.
Please, bring some evidence to the table before you go calling one or
the other wrong.
---
And kudos to Chichiri for that little thingy on SS. That's why you people have every right to be "elitist". - Slowflake