Vercetti's severely underperforming today. More than 4 points under the
X-Sts' projection. Is VC dying down? Would he lose to DK this year?
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
OK, Why exactly is Kefka so unpopular?. I don't know if anyone compared
which character was furthest away from his games performance is the
Spring Contest but Kefka must be close to that title. Final Fantasy 6
was 6th (I think)in the extrapolated rankings yet that massive
popularity is not even enough to turn him into a mid carder.
I know that game popularity =/= character popularity but the difference in this case is absolutely massive.
I haven't played FF6, is Kefka really irritating in the game that would cause a lot of FF6 fans to hate him?
---
SC2K4: 10/10
Todays Pick: Tommy Vercetti
he got 45%, making him a strong character
No, I still
don't think that "made" him a strong character. All it made him was a
character perceived as higher than he actually was. I'm not saying
Shadow isn't a strong character at all, he still is.
here,
look at the number of perfect brackets: 7712 had Tidus and only 3220
had Shadow. if a mere 800 people would've changed their minds to Shadow
and voted with their bracket to maintain their perfect bracket, Shadow
would've won, despite still being a significant underdog. and that's a
very small number, proportionately.
Good theory but, this
theory can apply to almost every match. Look at the Ness vs Jak coming
up. My gut told me to put Jak, but in the end I have Ness winning. I'm
sure most of the bracketeers have Jak winning. So when Jak wins, can I
say the same thing in the above quote? Nah.
---
Happiness is like peeing on yourself. Everyone can see it, but only you feel it's warmth.
70 percent getting that match right does by no means mean that it was
obvious. The average bracket maker doesnt seem to know what they are
doing, a fact we've seen time and time again.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
I haven't played FF6, is Kefka really irritating in the game that would cause a lot of FF6 fans to hate him?
FF6 fans that I know unanimously believe Kefka to be the greatest villain ever.
---
Link, Alucard, Magus, Crono, Mario, Knuckles, Kefka, Cloud, Sonic...
And Frog.
Vercetti's severely underperforming today. More than 4 points under
the X-Sts' projection. Is VC dying down? Would he lose to DK this year?
SFF? *shudders* I feel dirty just saying that, I suppose it is possible though.
Seriously
I think VC could be dying down a little. Vice City was massive on this
site last year, but Tommy is a real one hit wonder. Not just because
it's only one game but because he is likely to be very popular at first
then declining. I suspect his fanbase are pretty fickle. Many people
who were coming here last year looking for Vice City cheats probably
don't visit anymore, at least until San Andreas comes out.
Plus Max Payne 2 came out after the last contest which should give Max a little boost.
---
SC2K4: 10/10
Todays Pick: Tommy Vercetti
FF6 fans that I know unanimously believe Kefka to be the greatest villain ever.
Exactly. That's what I keep hearing, I just can't understand why he does so badly.
---
SC2K4: 10/10
Todays Pick: Tommy Vercetti
It's possible that FF6's strength comes from its name, and that most
people who voted for it never played it so that have no clue who Kefka
is. *shrug*
---
Link, Alucard, Magus, Crono, Mario, Knuckles, Kefka, Cloud, Sonic...
And Frog.
Shadow vs Tidus is a good example of how extrapolated statistics can be used poorly.
Shadow
vs Tidus is a good example of how accurate extrapolated statistics can
be. If I'm not mistaken, Shadow was supposed to win with 50.04% of the
votes...that didn't happen, obviously, but the final percentages still
showed that it was a very close match. To me, that shows how accurate
they are. You can't rely on that ranking system to the exact hundredth
of a percent, but it's generally a good estimate.
---
Supporting both Earthworm Jim AND Mega Man in 2004
Spring Contest Score: 151/192
I agree that the extrapolated rankings are a good source of info. It
showed that yesterday's match would be close, and it was. I don't think
it's that useful in deciding the winner of a match when two characters
are that close in the rankings, though.
---
***Married to UltimaterializerX on 5/21/04***
This year is Sephiroth's year! Contest Score: 10/10, Next Winner: Tommy Vercetti
cyko:
from the day the bracket was posted, this match was
completely undecided. this was supposed to be one of the closest
matches of this contest. and it looks like it will live up to the
expectation. Shadow and Tidus were expected to be equals and anytime a
match is this close (51/49), the characters might as well be equal.
Exactly
cyko. Tidus vs. Shadow was never a clear-cut result. Tidus deserved to
be a slight favorite, but Shadow could obviously have won.
Saying
this match was "obvious" shows a lack of understanding of the term. If
Shadow had won, a lot of people would've found that "obvious" as well,
but clearly the match wasn't truly obvious.
Slowflake:
Oh,
and talk about Tidus not getting proper respect. All I hear is how
Megaman is going to destroy him. When he fails to do so, everyone will
jump on the "Snake will beat Megaman" bandwagon. I can see it happening.
You mean Frog... :o)
I
understand though. You had a Freudian slip there just because your
blind Mega Man fanboyism is blinding you from thinking clearly.
Leonhart4:
Actually,
if the rankings didn't exist, I think Shadow would have been an
overwhelming favorite among those who had knowledge of the contest. For
most people, it would be mind-boggling to think that the despised Tidus
could get 45% on Mario like Shadow did. Even with the rankings people
flat-out denied that.
Yup, definitely. If it hadn't been for
the rankings, Tidus would have still been a huge favorite on the
general brackets, but gotten NO RESPECT WHATSOEVER on the boards.
The
people around here take it for granted that they "know" Tidus was
underrated by most board members, but I do not recall one single person
standing up and giving Tidus any respect before I started touting him
as a legit contender prior to SC2K3. And even then my stance was pretty
much ignored until *after* the contest, when this "Tidus is underrated"
bandwagon began.
RamzaB:
That's because Board
voters occasionally buy in to the extrapolated rankings and character
hate, instead of looking at the obvious.
Dude, without the extrapolateds, Tidus would've been even more underrated by the board. Now THAT is "obvious".
Ulti:
Didn't
everyone yell at me earlier for saying this match was obvious? Are you
still going to argue with me, despite 70% of people thinking Tidus
would win?
HUH? WTF kinda logic is this?
Halo vs. Starcraft was even more obvious then.
The
general brack makers obviously had LESS of an idea on this match than
the board members!!! Board members thought it was close, and it was.
The general bracket makers clearly overrated Tidus' chances. 70% is far
higher than it should have been.
Slowflake:
was favored over Ganondorf last year, yet we were all WTF when he made the match close.
People
wouldn't have been if they had listened to me ;) That went exactly as I
told people it would. I flat out said that people would underrate Ganon
after he didn't beat Tidus by much (if he beat him at all), and did
anybody listen? Of course not. <sigh> Damn young'uns.
---
Supporter of Frog
SC2K4.com/Frog
Oh, and why the **** did I pick Tommy to win with 66% in the Oracle
Challenge. I *HATE* Tommy. I would've known he would underperform if I
had thought about this match for more than 2 seconds.
---
Supporter of Frog
SC2K4.com/Frog
since 70% of the brackets had Tidus....does anyone think bracket voting is the reason Tidus won?
---
These
days, the geekier I get, the more employable I get. So calling me a
geek is not an insult, but a statement of hope. Level 1: Petrifier (105
points)
Extrapolated rankings can be misused if you think they are always
right. You always have to account for a margin of error, and for
characters that are within 1-2% of each other, the higher ranked
character isn't always going to win.
As
far as Tidus-Shadow being "obvious" is concerned, I said it several
times leading up to the match: I'll take the main character of the PS2
Final Fantasy over a character in a declining series on this site. In a
match between two practically equal characters, you have to give the
edge to Final Fantasy.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
First round: (13)Bomberman
The general brack makers obviously had LESS of an idea on this match
than the board members!!! Board members thought it was close, and it
was. The general bracket makers clearly overrated Tidus' chances. 70%
is far higher than it should have been.
So, what you're
saying is that the general bracket makers were wrong to pick Tidus,
even though he won? Listen to yourself, man. You're not making sense
here. Ever consider that maybe you underestimated Tidus, as
opposed to the general public overestimating him? 70% of all bracket
makers expected Tidus to win but less than half the BOP made that same
call. Seeing as Tidus won, this demonstrates that the general public
did better than the board members because the board overanalyzed the
match, while most bracket makers took one look at the match and said
"Oh, look, some hedgehog guy versus Tidus, the main character of FFX.
That series is pretty popular around here, so I'll go with Tidus,"
which is exactly what the match boiled down to.
---
***Married to UltimaterializerX on 5/21/04***
This year is Sephiroth's year! Contest Score: 10/10, Next Winner: Tommy Vercetti
Yeah, today's going to kill me in the Oracle Challenge. I was 8th
BEFORE Tidus/Shadow, which I nailed almost perfectly IIRC. I actually
gave Vercetti almost an extra point compared to the X-Sts projection.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
LordofDabu:
By the way, saying that I question how obvious
the outcome of a match is doesn't mean I missed the match! I just don't
see the point of the "we told you so" posts from those of us who were
correct, which in this case was picking Tidus, when I don't believe the
outcome of the match was certain, unless you honestly believe that
51-49 is not a close match.
Yes, exactly. I thoght Tidus had
a significantly better shot of winning than Shadow did, but the match
was always at least somewhat up in the air.
Just because Tidus
won doesn't mean he was fated to do so. Thinking that is similar to the
logic that made people underrate Tidus in the first place--losing close
matches early in the contest doesn't make you a weak competitor.
Thinking that Tidus' victory over Shadow makes him obviously superior
to Shadow in terms of contest strength is not the proper way to think.
There's just not much difference between the two characters. There
might be in the future, but there wasn't last year, and there isn't
this year.
And I can't believe I'm actually defending Shadow. I dislike the Sonic series and Shadow seems annoying.
---
Supporter of Frog
SC2K4.com/Frog
Argh, I shouldn't have deleted my prediction of Tommy with around 63%
AND changed my pick to him in Spread Betting. I figured he would
underpeform as always.
---
Ganon vs. Alucard - http://www.stripcreator.com/comics/Moltar
Tommy vs. Max - Bracket: Tommy - Vote: Tommy (9/10)
So, what you're saying is that the general bracket makers were wrong
to pick Tidus, even though he won? Listen to yourself, man. You're not
making sense here.
If you actually thought about it, you'd see I was making perfect sense.
The general bracket makers clearly overrated Tidus' chances of winning that match.
Ever consider that maybe you underestimated Tidus, as opposed to the general public overestimating him?
Whoa
there...you *do* know who you're talking to right? I was the one who
started preaching about Tidus being underrated. And I've mentioned that
fact a lot recently.
70% of all bracket makers expected Tidus
to win but less than half the BOP made that same call. Seeing as Tidus
won, this demonstrates that the general public did better than the
board members because the board overanalyzed the match, while most
bracket makers took one look at the match and said "Oh, look, some
hedgehog guy versus Tidus, the main character of FFX. That series is
pretty popular around here, so I'll go with Tidus," which is exactly
what the match boiled down to.
This is not the proper way to think about the situation.
So
let's say that 50.01% of the board thought Mario would beat Crono last
year (making this up), but 80% of the general brackets thought Mario
would win. Just because Mario ended up winning, demonstrates that the
board is clueless and the general brackets are WISER!!~~11!
I don't think so.
---
Supporter of Frog
SC2K4.com/Frog
If as few as 774 people changed their vote from Tidus to Shadow, Shadow wins.
774 voters, out of 95,122.
I wouldn't declare that "obvious".
---
-----
-------
You know, I think Ness vs. Jak could go about the same as Tidus vs.
Shadow. This is a highly debated match on this board, but yet I
wouldn't be surprised to see Jak as the overall bracket favorite by a
good margin.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
First round: (13)Bomberman
For all we know Kefka did face quite a bit of SFF against Crono.
Considering Pac-Man I wouldn't say it's a lot, nor enough to outright
beat Knux this year, but he may keep it closer than we expect.
"I haven't played FF6, is Kefka really irritating in the game that would cause a lot of FF6 fans to hate him?"
No, Kefka rocks, but there is deffinately better reps for the game than him.
"It's
possible that FF6's strength comes from its name, and that most people
who voted for it never played it so that have no clue who Kefka is."
You're joking, right? FF6 is the second strognest FF for a damn good reason.
"Tidus deserved to be a slight favorite, but Shadow could obviously have won."
Tidus
was a reasonably big favorite, and it was enough so that Shadow
couldn't have won. Maybe, just maybe, if there ween't brackets Shadow
could have taken it. There were, they were lopsided towards Tidus, and
he won just like a majority of the bracketmackers predicted.
"fanboyism is blinding"
You
just implied that Frog is capable of beating Mega Man when we lack the
evidence to say that Crono and Magus are capable of doing the same...
"Dude, without the extrapolateds, Tidus would've been even more underrated by the board"
And they would have been even more wrong. A bunch of fools they are. That's why I don't listen to the board.
"The general bracket makers clearly overrated Tidus' chances."
As
a wise man once said, it doesn't matter if Tidus wins by 2 or 20,000,
he won. A much larger % off the boards knew that then on the boards,
and so it was pretty obvious. Just because it was close (as was
expected) doesn't mean the winner was in question.
"does anyone think bracket voting is the reason Tidus won?"
gIt's
possible. However, I'd be willin to be a significant number of people
with Tidus in their bracket did so grudgingly and still voted their
"heart" with Shadow despite all that. Frankly, so people put the safe
bet in their bracket even if it's not who they want to win, then they
still turn around and vote for who they want to win. I do it all the
time. I voted for Alucard, but had Ganon winning. So sad...
"In a match between two practically equal characters, you have to give the edge to Final Fantasy."
That's what the board keeps forgetting.
---
True love is a fairy tale. I'm damaged, so how would I know? - Plummet: Damaged
Except Ness will win.
---
BtT: 4:07.55 | HRC: 47,493.0 ft OV aaaargh
Crash.
I wouldn't be surprised to see Jak as the overall bracket favorite by a good margin.
Strange, I would expect Ness to be the one to do that.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
[This message was deleted at the request of a moderator or administrator]
I really don't expect Ness to be the bracket favorite against Jak. If he is, it'll be just barely.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
First round: (13)Bomberman
SC2K4 FIRST DRAFT - PAGE 12 - (4) ZERO vs. (13) PROTOMAN
Disclaimer:
This preview series may contain mildly offensive stuff, as well as
SPOILERS, not only for the characters discussed, but other stuff as
well. This is the third preview in a row where there's some FFX-2 diss
somewhere, I should take a break.
Hurray for lame SFF
matches... again. The powerful Zero vs. the untested Protoman. I don't
understand how some people think Zero can lose this. I mean come on. If
Protoman can win by any sort of semi-comfortable margin, that would put
him in the Snake/Sonic/Magus/Ganondorf group at worst. And believe me,
he just can't be that strong. Zero came within 5000 votes of Sonic, and
the two split the night vote evenly. Protoman can be loved all he
wants, but if he's not important enough in the series, he just can't
win. Seriously. Zero's in a dead heat with Shadow for second place in
the "fan-favorite" department.
I'm no Megaman junkie, merely a
sympathizer. But I do know that Zero dies on a basis just as regular as
Kenny McCormick. Well, as far as a robot can be considered "living",
that is. And apparently some people take the "living" concept too far.
I mean, Zero pr0n? Apparently it exists, and in disturbing amounts.
Come on now, Zero is a set of scraps of metal. HE'S ALREADY NAKED FOR
CRISSAKES!!!
There's some guy on the board who put Vercetti over
Zero on the basis that Zero (and Protoman too, he said) was from
F-Zero. Urgh. I know, the interviewer from GX is called Zero too, but
at least they had the decency to add a "Mr." in front to avoid getting
sued by Capcom. Way to go, genius.
Protoman. Truth be told, I
know a sum total of Zero about this guy. Except that people like him.
And he wears a scarf. Wait a minute, what's with scarves and video game
that don't need them, be it robots or scantily-clad women? Is it
supposed to be badass or something? Well, compared to Sonic Team's
definition of "badass", a pink ball of fluff sure is, let alone a scarf.
I
know nothing about Protoman, but the very idea of him beating Dante or
Luigi is just crazy talk, I believe. He's probably the strongest
13-seed in the field, but him being on the level of say, KOS-MOS or Ken
Masters seems about right. Yes, he's a Megaman character. Yes, the most
insignificant character from the Megaman universe scored 25% on Mario.
But being a character from a popular series does NOT warrant a spot in
the top half of the field. Ask Wario. Or Ramza. Or Kefka. Or Tails.
So
my verdict is... well, I'll go with the consensus and say Zero should
double up Protoman, but not much more. Where can SFF go? Obviously,
Zero is really really loved here. But Protoman is in MMAC, and Zero is
not. So... I'll just set SFF aside for tomorrow.
NUMBERS OF INTEREST
SC2K3 extrapolated standings
14. Zero - 32.21%
DNE. Protoman
Board Odds Project picks (119 brackets)
Zero - 116
Protoman - 3
Board Odds Project point value
13. Zero - 340
46. Protoman - 7
CONTEST TRIVIA
Zero is the non-Noble Nine character that came closest to beating a Noble Nine character in a direct match.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
The point I'm making, is that declaring the outcome of a contest as
"obvious" when you can look at 0.81% as being the deciding margin of
sorts. Less than 1%!
I
was confident from day 1 when I picked Tidus, but I wouldn't say that
this match is worthy of an "obvious" denotation. It basically makes the
word obvious useless for practical purposes.
---
-----
-------
The name of the topic isn't "Semantics stats and discussion".
Let's just say those who thought Shadow had it in the bag never had a point at all and leave it at that.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
Contest Stats and Useless Hyperbole it is, then.
---
-----
-------
Enough talk about the damn Tidus/Shadow match. The results speak for
themselves! Yes, the match was close but was Tidus ever in jeopardy of
losing the match? No matter how many times Shadow threatened, Tidus
kept his lead well over 1000 votes. Yes, 800 people COULD have voted
for Shadow over Tidus. But the fact of the matter is that they didn't . The match played itself out, and there is no denying the results.
Kudos
to those who thought that Tidus was more popular, even if not by that
much. That's all there is to it. This wasn't even a match that went
back and forth ala Mario/Crono, Starcraft/WW, or any other match. Tidus
held a 1000+ lead for most of the match and that's based on FACT, not
theory, not rankings. Hell, plenty of things COULD happen. 800 people
who voted for Shadow could have voted for Tidus, then this wouldn't
even have been in discussion. Grady Little COULD have taken Pedro out.
Karl Malone's knee COULD have been healthier against the Pistons. The
Titans COULD have gotten the yard that they needed against the Rams.
But what do all of these have in common? They didn't.
Can we please move on?
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
I have a feeling that Jak will have the majority of brackets on his side, whether or not he wins.
---
-----
-------
ChichiriMuyo beat me to the punch.....
---
"There are only 10 kinds of people in this world, those that read binary and those that don't."
Hurricane Charley hits mah house Friday. I'm so freaking excited, seriously. *rolls eyes*
---
I'm safe until the next toss-up match, which is Bowser vs. Guybrush. ~SuperLuigiBros
SC2K4 Score: 9/9 Next Pick: Tidus
I still have a very hard believing Ness could obtain the casual vote.
It's pretty much a given that Earthbound won't do it for him, neither
will Nintendo loyalty (or less DK would be top 15-20 material), so it
has to come from the SSB games. Will that be enough? I have my doubts...
---
My name is Reggie. I'm about kicking ass; I'm about taking names, and we're making games.
"ChichiriMuyo beat me to the punch....."
Yes, but I didn't make reference to the all-awesome Karl Malone
---
True love is a fairy tale. I'm damaged, so how would I know? - Plummet: Damaged
SSBM made the Final 4 this spring.
I'll say it again.
SSBM MADE THE FINAL 4.
Now,
I still maintain this would've been a different ball game had WW faced
Starcraft on any other day. But SSBM is very, very strong.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
And character =/= games. I had SSBM reaching the Final Four from the beginning, and I'm still taking Jak to beat Ness.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
First round: (13)Bomberman
"I still maintain this would've been a different ball game had WW faced Starcraft on any other day"
SSBM
had a bigger advantage over WW than SC, regardless of how WW did
against SC. I'm tellin' ya man, SSBM is universally loved and WW is
not, SSBM takes the Nintendo vote AND the 80% sailing vote.
---
True love is a fairy tale. I'm damaged, so how would I know? - Plummet: Damaged
Just because it was close (as was expected) doesn't mean the winner was in question.
I would have to disagree with that. If a match is close, the winner is never obvious even if the match is expected to be close.
Like
Mario's victory over Crono. Because it was so close, it was still
obvious that Mario would win because his victory was expected to be
close? Hardly.
---
The only reason this is here is because posts without sigs look ugly.
Mario and Crono is a whole other matter. First, MvC always has strange
happenings towards the end of the match. Second, it was about 10 times
closer than Tidus vs. Shadow. You people just don't realize that Tidus
vs. Shadow wasn't that close at all.
---
True love is a fairy tale. I'm damaged, so how would I know? - Plummet: Damaged
Characters may not equal games, else the entire SSBM cast would be as strong as Mario.
But,
that means an assload of people played the game, and many people who
don't recognize Jak will recognize Ness. This is a jobber vs. jobber
match, remember, and in these anything can **** the math over.
And, there's always the possibility of Bowser absorbing that SSBM recognition vote with his own fame. AKA SFF.
---
SC2K4 Status - Points: 010/010 - Matches: 10/10 - Rank: 00001/33221 - Today: Vercetti - Tomorrow: Zero
I really don't expect Ness to be the bracket favorite against Jak. If he is, it'll be just barely.
I'm
sure more people have Ness winning than do Jak. People who are not
familiar with the contest will see Ness from Earthbound/SSBM as a 6
seed against Jak, an 11-seed, and put him ahead. However, what they
don't realize is Ness always horribly underperforms. GO JAK!
---
He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever.
*Printable SC2K4 Bracket!* (See quote for link)
Chichiri:
"fanboyism is blinding"
You
just implied that Frog is capable of beating Mega Man when we lack the
evidence to say that Crono and Magus are capable of doing the same...
I think
you were quoting me, so I'll respond. I was joking. You know, irony?
Accusing Slowflake of blind fanboyism when I'm the blind Frog fanboy?
Hence the smiley :o) (or is it "smilie"...hmm...)
I actually do
have Frog beating Solid Snake in my bracket (though he might struggle
to get 40% on Solid Snake), but not even I could picture him beating
Mega Man. I still have Mega Man winning the division. And I don't think
it's impossible for Liquid Snake to beat Frog.
And they would have been even more wrong. A bunch of fools they are. That's why I don't listen to the board.
The
board >>>> general brackets, obviously. And I'd say that a
good majority of the Top 50 of the past couple contests wouldn't have
been there without board input (not like this statement is going out on
a stretch or something).
As a wise man once said, it doesn't matter if Tidus wins by 2 or 20,000, he won.
That
would have to be the biggest dumbass of a wise man ever, then :)
Obviously it matters a lot. If Link beats CATS by 10,000 votes only,
then guess what, he ain't winning jack. (or CATS has suddenly become
capable of beating Mario one-on-one)
Michael Jordan and some
high school varsity player would both beat me at basketball. But
Michael Jordan would take about 2 minutes to beat me 21-0 playing
halfcourt, I'd actually score a few points on the varsity player.
You
have to look at these *events* as *experiments*. The speed at which one
basketball player beats another, and the points he allows, clearly says something
about him. There's a reason why a blowout loss, or a sweep loss in a
playoff series, is embarrassing. A game 7 OT loss might be far more
heartbreaking, but that's because you knew the team *was right there*.
Get swept, and you know they were outclassed.
A .500 NBA team
averages about the same points for as points against. A championship
caliber team, on average, beats its opponents comfortably (in the NBA,
typically by at least 5 points/game). The same is true for all pro
sports--the championship level teams have the best point differentials.
Not all victories are created equal. This is just about the most self-evident fact there is.
---
Supporter of Frog
SC2K4.com/Frog
Now, I still maintain this would've been a different ball game had
WW faced Starcraft on any other day. But SSBM is very, very strong.
During
Starcraft's static fanbase stages, the lead comparisons between Wind
Waker and SSBM against Starcraft were 2000 and 3700. SSBM would kill
Wind Waker in that match.
I'm saying one more thing about Tidus
before laying it to rest. Everyone knew in advance that the match would
be close before it started, but it was one of those close matches where
the loser never had a good chance to come back. Unlike most matches, I
wasn't worried in the least when Shadow trimmed 400 votes off of the
lead. The match was just omfg obvious from the start that it
would play out that way. If anything, Shadow did worse than I thought
he would. I thought he would take a lead of 500-700 in a slow, grinding
manner throughout the day, and then Tidus would have to come back
later. Tidus gettng the lead right from the start was a shock to me.
---
Winner of the Spring 2004 'Best. Game. Ever.' Contest
*Married to smitelf on 5/21/04*
That's true, the seeding could easily sway the minds of the many who don't really care about either Jak or Ness.
---
-----
-------
I predicted SSBM to get to the Final Four, and I was confident in it
doing so throughout, even if it would face WW. I was actually more
worried about StarCraft than Wind Waker.
---
He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever.
*Printable SC2K4 Bracket!* (See quote for link)
If anything, Shadow did worse than I thought he would
Weird since you said the exact opposite during the middle of the match
---
The only reason this is here is because posts without sigs look ugly.
Somebody WILL have a perfect bracket. Too much previous data for it not to happen.
---
...and it begins! Next tough match: VYSE vs. Laharl
I think you're mistaken if you expect Jak to be as weak as Ratchet.
That's about where he has to be for Ness to win, barring some SFF
against Bowser. He's a much more recognizable character on the primary
system of GameFAQs.
---
Squall Leonhart's Road to the Summer Championship
First round: (13)Bomberman