Ness was great in SSB, in fact, it isn't like SSBM is really
introducing him to a new crowd because the same N64 era people got to
see him.
---
Summer Contest 2004 Winner: Mega Man
http://www.angelfire.com/games5/heroicmario/Summer2004Winner.gif
hmm that's true...I guess that it only really helps the small crowd
that bough melee but not ssb, although that's not too unlikely, ssb did
come out pretty late, and ssbm is the title for gamecube, but still, it
probably is a small group.
---
If you work hard you can achieve great things in life...........and then you die. - from dilbert
Um, no. Sephiroth's major opponents before Cloud, Megaman and Mario, stayed the same.
Slow, can you explain what you mean here? I don't understand what you're saying.
---
"A fool and his money are soon elected."
- Will Rogers
[This message was deleted at the request of the original poster]
Megaman and Mario maintained the same level of performance in 2003 as in 2002, essentially.
For
Megaman, instead of comparing with Link, because of the Link/Seph
match, or Sephiroth himself or Tidus, because of KH, or even Samus
because of Prime, we can just compare with Sonic or Ryu, which are more
reliable standards. (Ken's drop in performance is puzzling, but it
probably has nothing to do with Mega.)
---
SC2K4 Status - Elite 8: LINK, Mario, MEGAMAN, Snake, CLOUD, Sephiroth, Sonic, SAMUS
Isn't anybody else gonna comment on my theory?
---
Get Aeris and Zelda in the Summer Contest: http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=7&topic=14874452
Yesmar if your theroy is true then we would know on the Tidus vs. Shadow poll because Shadow had a match with Mario
---
LUE is a cancer, and if it can't be destroyed, it must be contained. - CjayC
Megaman and Mario maintained the same level of performance in 2003 as in 2002, essentially.
For
Megaman, instead of comparing with Link, because of the Link/Seph
match, or Sephiroth himself or Tidus, because of KH, or even Samus
because of Prime, we can just compare with Sonic or Ryu, which are more
reliable standards. (Ken's drop in performance is puzzling, but it
probably has nothing to do with Mega.)
Well, my basic point
was that Mega Man was pretty stable, so we can use him to measure
Sephiroth's increase. Although Sephiroth only gained 6% in the
extrapolated standings, he gained 11% vs. Mega Man, which is a much
more direct comparison. This leads me to believe that Sephiroth may
have underperformed against Cloud in the finals (which explains why he
only gained 6% in the extrapolated standings, instead of 11%).
---
"A fool and his money are soon elected."
- Will Rogers
Ness is god-awful in SSBM, yes.
Sorry Slow, but you just
don't know how to use him effectively. In the first SSB, I could beat 3
level 9 computers with Ness in a 3v1 team battle (and yes, I was the 1,
I'm not trying to be truthful but deceitful). In SSBM, the AI got
notched up a few levels, but I can still whoop my friends with him. I
used to know a guy who was totally untouchable with Ness on SSB.
Anyways,
I don't quite see how people seem to think that this is going to be a
one-sided easy win for either Ness or Jak. Frankly, I think it'll be
quite close, with the winner having no more than 53-54%. I'm leaning
towards Jak because EB doesn't have a gigantic fanbse (though its fans
are often big fanboys), not to mention that EB got beaten by Doom in
Spc2k4, a PC game not called Starcraft, which in turn got predictably
whooped by Final Fantasy III/VI. Ness does have the SSB/SSBM appeal,
but as a few of you have mentioned, he's not one of the most popular
characters in it because he's one of the hardest to master (especially
his triple jump). Jak, on the other hand, is a first-time entrant, so
it's hard to properly judge his popularity here. His games may not have
a huge number of FAQs, but as past contests have shown, the number of
FAQs means very little about game popularity, let alone character
popularity. In addition, both of Jak's games are pretty straightforward
(though extremely difficult at times) in terms of figuring out where to
go and what to do. Most of what you need in the FAQs is things such as
precursor orb locations, power cell locations (Jak 1 only), and boss
strategies. Most importantly, his games are just downright fun, except
during certain challenges which can be very frustrating, especially the
hover races in Jak II. The dialog is also very humerous (well, Daxter
does all the talking in the first game, but Jak learns to talk in the
second), which certainly adds to Jak's status. The only question is how
large Jak's fanbase is. Actually, the only question is how large Jak's
fanbse is on GameFAQs. I'm guessing it's a teeny bit smaller
here than overall, but I think it'll still be larger than EB's. After
all, Jak did get nominated by a large number of people. Anyways, I'm
giving Jak a slight edge, but like I said, expect this one to be close.
Sorry Slow, but you just don't know how to use him effectively. In
the first SSB, I could beat 3 level 9 computers with Ness in a 3v1 team
battle (and yes, I was the 1, I'm not trying to be truthful but
deceitful). In SSBM, the AI got notched up a few levels, but I can
still whoop my friends with him. I used to know a guy who was totally
untouchable with Ness on SSB.
I said that, and no he is not
anywhere near top notch material in SSBM. He is average at best in
SSBM, now SSB is a different story.
---
Summer Contest 2004 Winner: Mega Man
http://www.angelfire.com/games5/heroicmario/Summer2004Winner.gif
The SSB AI was horrible - beating 3 lvl 9 computers wasnt a huge
accomplishment. And Ness was weakened drastically in SSBM - he's not
horrible, but the stronger characters (read: Sheik, Fox, Marth, etc.)
tear him to pieces unless there's a fairly large player skill
difference.
So,
Ness is cool, but was drastically weakened. He can't stand up well
against the faster characters unless you put tons of time into learning
him, due to the fairly large learning curve on using him correctly.
Even then, a player on the same skill level as you will tear you apart
if they use any of the aforementioned characters - getting chain
juggled is never fun. Beyond that, Ness is annoying as hell - I've had
games where my friends have tried to gang up on me (as Ness) simply to
eliminate his high, squeaky voice whenever he uses a PK attack.
So, he's difficult to use, fairly effective against the better characters altogether, and he is obnoxious.
Oh, and his actual game he starred in is a cult classic.
I don't think SSBM will help Ness much, if at all. The bowser match last year was not SSBM SFF - ness is just that weak.
Will SSBM have given him exposure? Yes. But exposure is not nessecarily
equal to votes, as Pac-Man, Pikachu, and Bomberman can tell you. Ness
simply is not overly likeable for any reason other than Earthbound,
which not enough people have played for him to have a chance against
Jak. Jak won't massacre him, but this match likely won't even be close.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
And Ness, almighty god of SSB, please forgive me. You kicked ass in
SSB, but no matter how hard as i try in SSBM i can't justify using you
in serious matches.
Ah well....there's always SSB3. I hope.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
Anyone who believes in the SSBM tiers are worse than those SF2 whiners.
---
"Between gas leaks and electric lines someone could get seriously killed!" ~Miami Construction Guy
The bowser match last year was not SSBM SFF
No, it was Nintendo SFF -______-.
---
"Haha SMRPG wins because this is RPGFAQs." "If SMRPG wins then GameFAQs has no credibility." - Fanboys.
Anyone who believes in the SSBM tiers are worse than those SF2 whiners.
That's the other way around buddy. Then again you don't need them if you just play with friends, tournaments are different.
---
Summer Contest 2004 Winner: Mega Man
http://www.angelfire.com/games5/heroicmario/Summer2004Winner.gif
No, it was Nintendo SFF -______-.
I don't really buy
that either. Ness is not associated well enough with Nintendo in terms
of being a fixture to suffer major SFF. Both are nintendo characters,
but one is a mario character and one is from a cult RPG. Whatever SFF
factor there was against Bowser was small, if anything.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
Both are nintendo characters, but one is a mario character and one is from a cult RPG
Exactly.
---
"Haha SMRPG wins because this is RPGFAQs." "If SMRPG wins then GameFAQs has no credibility." - Fanboys.
Anyone who believes in the SSBM tiers are worse than those SF2 whiners.
HM
is right on this. Anyone really claiming that the characters are equal
is deluding themselves - to believe that you can evenly balance 20+
characters is just silly. While this generally won't kick into play as
much in casual play, with enough time put into the game it becomes
obvious. When two good players are both roughly evenly skilled at the
game, a Sheik will beat a Ness the vast majority of the time.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
I don't really buy that either. Ness is not associated well enough
with Nintendo in terms of being a fixture to suffer major SFF. Both are
nintendo characters, but one is a mario character and one is from a
cult RPG. Whatever SFF factor there was against Bowser was small, if
anything.
If you know enough about Ness to support Ness, you
will know about his association with Nintendo. I'd say almost all of
Ness' support will be from Nintendo fans, so Bowser can suck tons of
votes away with SFF.
Ness' position in the tier listing for SSBM
really mean very much. Very few of the voters are hardcore SSBM players
who frequent tournement. Also Ness isn't that bad in SSBM. His biggest
problem is that the characters that are best against him are the top
tier characters, the ones used most often in tournements.
A
friend of mine is one of the best SSBM players in the province and an
outstanding Ness player. So I guess it's kinda difficult for me to see
Ness as a weak character after getting totally decimated by him so many
times.
---
"Those whose memories fade seek to carve them in their hearts..."
"All dreams are but another reality. Never forget..."
ya know, i still haven't seen any arguments here that show Jak to be
any different than Ratchet. i guess his game did sell a little better
than Ratchet's, but i haven't seen either get more exposure than the
other. and as for the pics, Ness might be goofy-looking, but Jak isn't
any prettier. neither of them has a good pic.
like
i said before, Ness will have Super Smash Bros. and Nintendo and RPG
fans on his side. he didn't have those advantages over Bowser, because
Bowser shared all of the same factors. what does Jak have? huge, pointy
ears - that's what.
---
you guys nominated the wrong Shadow..... =(
Through great Luck (and a bit of skill) ULTI pounded me in the Spring Contest!!
The tiers are completely wrong. I've seen and participated in
tournaments, Marth and Sheik have never won, and Fox has won once. It
depends on the skills, not the tiers. But GameFAQers need tiers to
live, and they have mande it the norm, and since my opinion doesn't
matter here, the stupidity will continue.
---
"Between gas leaks and electric lines someone could get seriously killed!" ~Miami Construction Guy
I'd say almost all of Ness' support will be from Nintendo fans, so Bowser can suck tons of votes away with SFF.
Some votes? Yes. More than two or three percent? Unlikely.
They
are both nintendo, true. However, ness comes from a cult game. That
disenfranchises him from receiving the bulk of the pure nintendo votes
- few, if any casual gamers will have heard of him at all. Ness would
not be pulling in a large percentage of the nintendo base, almost
regardless of who you put him up against. The nintendo fanbase simply
doesnt care about ness, and would no more vote in droves for ness than
the square fanbase would go crazy saving the dog from secret of
evermore.
True, many Ness fans will be nintendo fans as well.
But hell - if you are already a ness fan, then whatever god forsaken
reason made you a ness fan in the first place is likely to make you
place him over bowser anyway. Again, one is an cult RPG character, one
is freaking BOWSER. The fanbases, even though they belong to the same
company, are already different enough that SFF won't really come
heavily into effect. Ness just doesnt have enough support on this site,
and honestly probably only made it into this contest because of
die-hard Earthbound fans.
Cult characters suck in this contest - plain and simple.
Ness'
position in the tier listing for SSBM really mean very much. Very few
of the voters are hardcore SSBM players who frequent tournement. Also
Ness isn't that bad in SSBM. His biggest problem is that the characters
that are best against him are the top tier characters, the ones used
most often in tournements.
I agree with you. A good ness
player can tear his opposition apart. But hell, forget tournament -
even in casual play, ness will get absolutely destroyed by characters
who are in the top two tiers. While i feel he is stronger in general
than most of the other characters in the game, considering there are
six or seven characters that eat ness alive he deserves his spot
towards the bottom of the tiers.
I play SSBM, and while i
don't claim to be a tournament quality player, I've gotten my Ness to a
point where he is deadly. When I'm playing with any of my friends from
around home, none of them can even touch him, and I'm as effective with
him as with any other character. However, up at college, where a few of
my friends spend a bit more time playing the game, i see a
dramatic drop off in effectiveness. My ness can still beat most of the
characters badly, but the top two tiers are nigh untouchable. Shiek,
Marth, Fox, Falco .... Ness can't even touch my friends when i play
against them.
Now, using my best characters (Sheik/Fox) I can
still destroy them, so the problem likely isnt with me. From my
experience, Ness is great against an average player using an average
character....but a good player, using one of the better characters,
makes ness all but unplayable.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
The tiers are completely wrong. I've seen and participated in
tournaments, Marth and Sheik have never won, and Fox has won once. It
depends on the skills, not the tiers. But GameFAQers need tiers to
live, and they have mande it the norm, and since my opinion doesn't
matter here, the stupidity will continue.
Er, of course it
depends on skill. A good Bowser player will never lose a match to a guy
who has never played a game of SSBM before, no matter what character
the new guy uses. But with players of roughly equal skill, Bowser is
going to get his ass chain juggled into oblivion by Sheik.
Tiers
exist - even fighting game with characters who aren't carbon copies of
one another have tiers. This isnt just gamefaqs that believes this, its
general accepted in any community that plays fighting games.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
Am I the only one that thinks the AI in SSB was MUCH harder than SSBM?
---
Supporter of Sora for SC2K4!
Am I the only one that thinks the AI in SSB was MUCH harder than SSBM?
Probably.
---
I GOTTA HAVE MORE COWBELL
Am I the only one that thinks the AI in SSB was MUCH harder than SSBM?
Yes.
In
SSB, most average players could handle 3 lvl 9 computers with little
difficulty. In SSBM, it is still possible to handle 3 lvl 9 computers
but in general takes much more AI abuse - it is nigh impossible to take
out 3 ganondorfs, foxes or falcons in a straight, fair fight. In SSB,
you could handle the computers without resorting to as many tricks -
they were good, but not great.
---
2k4 - The Summer of Sephiroth.
The tiers are completely wrong. I've seen and participated in tournaments, Marth and Sheik have never won, and Fox has won once.
How many and how big were they? Many tournements are won by Marth and Shiek players.
It depends on the skills, not the tiers.
Obviously.
But when two players of near equal skill play several matches against
each other, the person with the higher tier character will win more
often.
But GameFAQers need tiers to live, and they have mande
it the norm, and since my opinion doesn't matter here, the stupidity
will continue.
It is pretty much impossible to create a game
with 20+ characters that are all perfectly balanced. Some characters
will be better than other, even if it's only a small amount.
I wonder if the tier wars is still going on...
---
"Those whose memories fade seek to carve them in their hearts..."
"All dreams are but another reality. Never forget..."
While it would take a brave/stupid man to disagree with Ulti I must
question some of his "tips". Personally I think Ryu H. is a mere trap
in disguise. Cjay expects people to fall into the trap of predicting
him to win due to his high seed rather then examining both characters
on offer. I think it is fair to say that the winnner of Jill v Ryu H.
will go into the sweet 16 but really with some people saying that he
will get 60% is crazy! Ryu H. would have to have the power of someone
like Squall which is something he just fails to possess. We all know
that Xbox games just are not popular here and the fact that he is
making his first appearance now suggests that nobody cares greatly
about his Nes appearances. The obvious winner getting out of the four
for me would be Jill.
---
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004 -
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004/user.doc - A downloadable file about user of the year 2004
Oh it did, Cloud gained 14% from 2002 to 2003 on Link while Sephiroth only gained 6%. Cloud skyrocketed up from 2002 to 2003.
Yeah but with FF7 dominating every area perhaps Cloud could fall back to his 2002 power? One can hope ~_~
---
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004 -
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004/user.doc - A downloadable file about user of the year 2004
It is humanly impossible to make a perfectly balanced fighter where the
characters are not exact copies of each other. While it is the goal of
developers to eliminate tiers as much as possible, they inevitably
fail, because we are merely human. Let's say that Bowser is stronger
than Marth, but slower. Does Bowser's strength make up for his lack of
speed? In part, yes. Does it make up his lack of speed to the point
where the two characters are exactly equal? No. If the developers had
given Bowser more strength, we might have the situation where he's
higher of the tier list than Marth, but as long as 1 point strength =/=
1 point speed, they can never be exactly equal.
As
for the tier list itself, that can be reasonably doubted, for it is the
work of voting at Smashboards. It has been changed before (I believe
Fox was recently added to Top Tier ahead of Marth.). I believe that it
is basically accurate, but there could be changes, especially as the
Tier List is only a representation of the most likely outcome of
battles undertaken between players of equal, extremely high skill, with
strategies such as those we have seen used. Should someone find a
strategy with Bowser than enables them to consistently defeat Marth and
Sheik, his placement will have to be reconsidered.
The Tier
List is not something that is set in stone in that if two players of
equal skill play, the higher tier character will not always win. They
merely have the higher probability of winning. Further, some characters
regularly outperform characters higher on the tier list than they are.
The reason they are not placed above them on the tier list is that they
do not do as well against other characters. For example, let us suppose
Roy beats Marth in direct combat. However, Marth beats 22 characters,
while Roy only outperforms 13. Thus, Marth will get a higher ranking on
the tier list inspite of losing to Roy in direct combat.
Finally,
skill is a much more important factor than tiers. Since the tier list
is meant for players with equal, extremely high skill anyway, and two
human players can never have exactly the same skill, skill is a much
more important factor, though tiers can influence matches between
players of very close skill.
---
1903, 1912, 1915, 1916, 1918, 2004!
Remember the 3rd GameFAQs Poll of the Day.
Am I the only one that thinks the AI in SSB was MUCH harder than SSBM?
Yes, yes you are.
So,
seeing as how this is my first post in any of the discussion topics,
except perhaps one in the very first one which was just a post to post
in it, do we sort of just... discuss the contest... as the.. name..
implies.. or.. something?
I figure we do, so, forgive me if I start discussing something already discussed on one of the earlier pages..
How does everyone think Kain will do against Kirby?
Being
a LoK fan, I am naturally inclined into thinking Kain can defeat Kirby.
Which doesn't sound so far fetched, imo. Kirby has proven in the past
to not be a very strong competitor, but do you think the puff ball
(Who, admitedly, was my favorite SSB character) will lose to Kain, or
beat him?
Well, even if he loses, I'm at least happy he got in.
About time they put the title character of the Legacy of Kain series
in, instead of Raziel. (Not that I don't like Raziel, I just prefer
Kain.)
---
Damnant quod non intellegunt
How does everyone think Kain will do against Kirby?
30-40%
---
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004 -
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004/user.doc - A downloadable file about user of the year 2004
Okay, time to run through the 250 posts that appeared out of no where:
I
am up for running the Guru Challenge, if y'all are fine with that.
Aside from having way too much free time, another pastime of mine is
loving to compile statistics. If this is cool with everyone, just let
me know and I will put up an email address y'all can send your brackets
to on August 1 (I don't want to see anyone else's before that,
obviously).
I already went through this in your topic, but just to make sure you notice:
HELL. ****ING. NO.
It`s
my contest after all, so I think I have the right to say I`m not fine
with it. All I saw was one post from Slowflake giving a reason why he
feels this would be better off in another topic, which I`ll deal with
in a minute. And I love how you didn`t even ask the originator of the
contest (me, obviously) if this was okay before making your own topic
and asking for people to e-mail you their brackets. Not only are you on
my **** list for a very long time for this, but now you may or may not
have a large sample of majority information to help you fill our your
bracket on top of really pissing me the hell off.
In
short, I would have let you help had you simply waited for me to answer
your question. But since you took it upon yourself to try and take over
my contest without me giving my own damned word first, the answer is
no. For a very, very long time.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
I just thought of something. What if the shift of the Contest poll
to a place where not everyone can see it changes the voting consensus
enough that it throws a good part of the data collected in the past two
years for a loop?
That's a very good theory, but I have
another thought entirely on that. Ever notice how Nintendo began
failing miserably after that poll was moved? Nintendo owns the casual
vote on this site (IMO), and the poll being moved really boosts
Square`s superiority around here until Zelda 10 comes out.
That said, Tidus's chances against Shadow got a lot better. But more on that in a minute.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
This topic has become something of a sign-up topic rather than discussion it would sem.
Which
creates more posts, which makes us feel cooler. Isn't that the whole
reason we created sequential topics in the first place? Honestly, who
cares if we experience an elevated post count due to Guru Contest
signups? The discussions are still easy enough to have.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Okay, I've done a five-minute version of my bracket (i.e. cursory
and subject to change) and I've currently got Link, Megaman, Cloud and
Samus as my final four, with Link and Cloud duking it out in the final
match and Link emerging victorious.
I still don't get where
Link got all of the love between last year and this year. I don't think
KHF has worn off that much yet, and the layout change only hurts
Nintendo's chances of picking up enough casual votes to win.
For me, I plan to put 2 "surprises" in my bracket that hopefully few others have. Guess what they are? :)
Frog over Solid Snake and Sonic over Samus.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Ulti, do we send our brackets to Slowflake?
---
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004 -
www.geocities.com/characterbattle2004/user.doc - A downloadable file about user of the year 2004
Sign ups?
Well, whatever it is, I suppose I'll sign up for it.
I never seem to get to the sign up topics on this board in time.
---
Damnant quod non intellegunt
Now, whatever could possibly be an important match where a
mainstream character is well-documented as needing all the help he can
get in narrowly overcoming a somewhat niche opponent, hmm?
Tidus vs Shadow? Mario vs Crono?
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Some people have argued this site is a Square and Nintendo fanboy headquarters, but there is no proof of that.
Look closely at the few games around here with staying power on this site.
Though
I hate to discourage you, I'll say that you probably won't win. Maybe
top 50, but not top 10. The best thing to do is make your bracket,
while expecting surprises, and contest upsets. It then becomes a "swim
or sink" deal. There's no floating, there's no or swallowing water
trying to swim. You either get remembered for a good rank, or sink in
with the flow.
For very obvious reasons, I'm disagreeing
with that entire paragraph on principle. And let me also add that those
sorts of comments shouldn`t be made from someone who has already told
everyone that this is their first contest. We've known these things for
three years, and there is no need for someone who started posting here
a week or so ago to reiterate them.
After doing some serious board lurking, here are my results:
Board
opinion doesn't mean anything in close matches. The majority of the
SSBM boards said that it had no chance against FFX, for example. Take
all of that with a grain of salt.
I suggest that next time, the guru contest is taken care of in a separate topic
This contest was meant to stay within our circle, and though our circle has obviously gotten quite large, it`s still our
circle. I can`t agree with you on that sentiment. And besides, the only
thing being taken up are posts. It takes 20 seconds to create a new
topic.
Crono will need to get past Magus first. In my
opinion, that match may be affected more than any other by the new
layout, as Crono is clearly the more mainstream choice, and Magus the
one with a rabid fanbase. The new layout should give supporting
characters a small boost against main characters. Most everyone I know
prefers Magus, so this upset is a very real possibility in my opinion.
Most of the people you speak to will tell you that they prefer Sephiroth over Cloud as well. It doesn`t really change anything.
thirdly,
i'm kinda in the same boat as Ulti about not divulging all of my picks
this early. i mean, people tend to forget that this is a COMPETITION
Yay for some common sense!
even
if you refuse my second point there, it's hard to believe that Tidus
can make up that 17.6 percentage point gap that Sonic left him with.
I
cannot picture any forseeable reason to think that Tidus would only
score 41.6% on Sonic should they ever meet again. The 2002 results had
some low vote totals in them. If you want proper reults, you may want to stick to solely 2003.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Lots of Guru participants this time. Perhaps we can hit a hundred this
time. I also added PregnantPrincess and CrAzYCarl73 to the list.
1 - UltimaterializerX
2 - Heroic Mario
3 - Sephirot1
4 - Ringworm
5 - Tnote827
6 - charmander6000
7 - DaruniaTheKing
8 - SteveIllumina
9 - Nightmare 45
10 - Krusty the Klown
11 - Red Sox 777
12 - Naye745
13 - Starion
14 - Yesmar
15 - swirldude
16 - King Morgoth
17 - jonthomson
18 - Z1mZum
19 - DomaDragoon
20 - Alanna82
21 - FastFalcon05
22 - andaca
23 - TyRaNuS
24 - Lieutenant Kettch
25 - Scoop Li
26 - FrostHarpy
27 - yoblazer33
28 - irriadin
29 - Haunter12O
30 - Aprosenf
31 - BeTheMan
32 - RamzaB
33 - Mac Arrowny
34 - Tai
35 - Cavemanbob
36 - Tarrot
37 - Phediuk
38 - TheCalmness
39 - nifboy
40 - WiggumFan267
41 - perdevious
42 - Haste2
43 - Yokel
44 - Qwaar
45 - MasterMage119
46 - arkenaga
47 - Shadowdude
48 - Tequilla Gundam
49 - Ziwei
50 - smitelf
51 - Heroic Knuckles
52 - StopPokingMe
53 - cyko
54 - Salient
55 - Sir Chris
56 - TheRye
57 - Rufus Shinra 18
58 - nh82
59 - Steinershocker
60 - Smurf Thy Legend
61 - BocaSE
62 - Garsha II
63 - A Hogasm IN POG FORM
64 - PregnantPrincess
65 - CrAzYCarl73
66 - Bananaquest
---
Join the Official Magus RPG Party ·¤· Hosted by Camwi for Summer 2004 Contest
UltimaterializerX: Spring 2004 Contest Guru Champion!
Ulti, do we send our brackets to Slowflake?
The brackets
that Slowflake collects are for the Board Odds Project. It is a project
designed to give us the odds each character has when Slowflake writes
up his article before every match, which is a must-read. It appears
solely in this topic, and submitting a bracket for his stats is not a
contest. He doesn`t tally who wins, just how many people pick certain
characters in each match.
As for the Guru Contest, keep your
bracket on hold. Simply copy-paste your name to the list, and be
prepared to post your bracket once the topic calling for them is made.
Sign ups?
Well, whatever it is, I suppose I'll sign up for it.
Copy-paste your name onto the list.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Good old Banana already put me on the list :)
I haven't seen you since like, 02, Banana. What hava you been up to lately?
---
Damnant quod non intellegunt
Ness still did just as well against Bowser as Ratchet did against Luigi
You
might want to look at those two polls again. There is a rather large
difference between Ratchet and Ness. The difference obviously gets much
closer when one factors in that Luigi is weaker than both Bowser and
Yoshi, but I don`t feel it`s nearly enough to give Ness the win.
but,
all of the yahoos who think that he will take out Solid Snake are in
for a rude awkening. that's where his goofy green looks will kill him.
all of the Frog fans on this board can't change the fact that he is
indeed a Frog. and pictures of frogs do not have mainstream appeal,
even if the frog does have a sword. =P
Honestly, what was
the last good picture you saw of Solid Snake? Especially in the third
round when CJayC used sprite pics last year?
It's commonly accepted that Ganondorf is within 1000 votes of Sonic at most.
Say what? That`s the first time I`ve ever heard this, and I can`t believe that would ever happen.
Before I go to bed, I'll just point out that you speak as if this board actually mattered at all.
When
you see a pre-poll in which one side beats the hell out of the other in
a debated match, it causes eyes to open. Snake vs Crono and Starcraft
vs Wind Waker are some perfect examples of this.
Kingdom
hearts lucked out early in SC2K3. Though it's still strong, it doesn't
beat Nintendo's SSBM, which features Mario. Hype for a new game is not
very strong unless it's already been released, OR, the previews are
extremely good.
Oh yes it does. SSBM was a horrendous
catalyst for characters such as Ganondorf, Ness, and Luigi. Kingdom
Hearts was the far better catalyst, and I`m not debating this with you
any further. It is a fact whether you believe it or not.
I don't understand Same Fanbase Factor. Does it only apply to matches where both characters are from the same game or company?
When two characters/games from the same company and the same era
(people forget this) square off, one of them will get completely
killed. The only exception I can really think of is Cloud vs Sephiroth
for obvious reasons. The era comment was because I don`t believe SFF
existed in Cloud vs Auron or Aeris vs Sora.
wait a second... i never played MGS2. was Liquid Snake even in that one? i was under the impression that he was.
Proof positive that Frog is going to the Sweet 16 with ease. I would love to see him in a match against Aeris.
Ranting? I mean raving! Stop mcoking my typos!
I`ve
known you since the first days of this board, and that`s the first time
you`ve ever made me laugh. I knew there was a wierdo in there somewhere
=)
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
It's commonly accepted that Ganondorf is within 1000 votes of Sonic at most.
Say what? That`s the first time I`ve ever heard this, and I can`t believe that would ever happen.
Well if Sonic vs. Ganondorf gets a vote total of exactly 100 000 votes Sonic would win within 500-600 votes
I don`t believe SFF existed in Cloud vs Auron
Actually
there was a very tiny one though if you look at Tails he went down .33%
and Auron beat Tails so he must have gone about the same, but then
again that's so little no one would see any big difference.
---
LUE is a cancer, and if it can't be destroyed, it must be contained. - CjayC
Considering Zidane probably isn't exactly the strongest FF character himself, how could Vivi win?
Black
Mage Factor, the fact that Aya Brea is from a far less popular game
than FFIX and still took DK to the brink, and the fact that DK is weak
as ****. More people picked Max Payne to win the 2003 contest than they
did DK.
We have never, EVER seen SFF work that way (in favor
of the weaker character), nor ever been given even the slightest hint
that it's possible.
Would Mario 3 vs Zelda 1 go against that? Until LTTP/FF6, Zelda looked flat-out unstoppable.
I decided to create a topic devoted solely to the Guru Challenge...
http://boards.gamefaqs.com/gfaqs/genmessage.php?board=8&topic=14923076
I`ve already yelled at you twice, but what`s one more?
Never, and I mean ****ing never steal someone`s else`s contest on this board.
Question:
Will Auron being in KH2 provide him a boost next year as well? I say
yes, as long as his character isn't mercilessly slaughtered by a second
game like a certain Yuna.
Jim Carrey could do the voice of Auron in that game, and he would still get a boost. In my opinion, of course.
Actually,
FF05 it seems to have originated in part from a bet between Shake and
myself. Funny then, that he and I should each take 3rd and 2nd
respectively.
Took you long enough to notice =) Yes, you and Shake inspired that contest.
Sephiroth was definitely stronger in 2k2, and I don't know of any reason the KH effect would have helped Cloud more than Seph.
Sephiroth is nothing more than an optional boss fight, while Cloud has an actual character and storyline in the game.
West 2002 factor, bro. Sephy's second and Mega's third might be legit, but at 39% instead of 43%, who knows.
I`ve
seen this discussed over and over again. What is all this talk about
inflated West 2002 numbers and Sephiroth overperforming against Link? I
would call 43% against Link underperforming when the match was expected
to be the next Mario/Cloud.
Someone needs to do an SFF-free list of the 2002 stats, and soon.
...there's also the obvious explanation that sff lowered mario's score against link.
Again, we need SFF-free 2002 stats. Those rankings are more ****ed up than the 2004 Spring Contest`s.
There's
only one good explanation for Mario overperforming against Cloud, and
it seems far too unlikley even for me to believe it. It's possible, but
not in any way likely.
And you never told us the explanation. I`m curious, man. Don`t leave me hanging!
Henceforth, Cloud and Sephiroth's increases are really due to more people playing FF7 instead of Kingdom Hearts itself.
I`ve
been saying that for a very long time now. What amazes me is that Link
is still the favorite in this contest. Kingdom Hearts and the layout
change will only hurt him.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Well if Sonic vs. Ganondorf gets a vote total of exactly 100 000 votes Sonic would win within 500-600 votes
Recursive rankings be damned. I just can`t see that happening.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf
Someone needs to do an SFF-free list of the 2002 stats, and soon.
I'll do one, but should I include the WDF (west division factor) too?
---
LUE is a cancer, and if it can't be destroyed, it must be contained. - CjayC
I've only found 2 matches that had SFF
Mario vs. Donkey Kong
Link vs. Mario
Is there any others that I missed?
---
LUE is a cancer, and if it can't be destroyed, it must be contained. - CjayC
Likewise, there's a factor that could ultimately affect this match, since compared to Bowser and Doom, Jak is a no-namer.
Super Smash Bros. Melee.
Slowflake,
aren`t you the one who originally said that SSBM was a lousy catalyst?
To say that SSBM could be the deciding factor in that match seems a
little odd coming from you, and I stick to my guns that 95% of Ness`s
popularity comes from Earthbound.
Ness is God awful in SSBM too.
When
was the last time you were in a melee match with three of your friends
and sent them all flying with a PK Flash after trapping them all in PK
Fire?
But I gotta admit, it's all pretty good for fanfic purposes.
The
best damned fanfic I`ve ever read, I might add. Have you fixed your
problem in reference to writing about Mega Man and Sonic yet?
I'm signing up with THIS account.
Main
accounts only, please. The whole idea is to be humiliated by having
someone`s name in the sig of the account you use the most.
Looking cool never matters in these contests.
I
can`t agree with that. Shadow the Hedgehog may defeat Tidus on the
backbone of his looks alone. If the two characters are dead even, then
something that small could seriously decide the match. Either way, it`s
one point. One friggen point. Who cares?
Anyone who believes in the SSBM tiers are worse than those SF2 whiners.
You cannot possibly be serious. Go and read the Tier FAQ for yourself.
The
tiers are completely wrong. I've seen and participated in tournaments,
Marth and Sheik have never won, and Fox has won once. It depends on the
skills, not the tiers. But GameFAQers need tiers to live, and they have
mande it the norm, and since my opinion doesn't matter here, the
stupidity will continue.
You need a balanced skill level for
the tiers to be accurate. If a player completely sucks at SSBM, I can
beat them at will with Pichu or Bowser.
Ryu H. would have to have the power of someone like Squall which is something he just fails to possess.
No matter what any of us say, we don`t know how strong a character is until he gets in a match for himself.
How does everyone think Kain will do against Kirby?
I say 45%, maybe more. Kirby is that damned weak, to be honest.
---
Married to smitelf on 5/21/04
Ulti pwned me so completely in the Sp2k4 contest that I won't be able to sit for a week. -smitelf